• Narrative Review
  • Clinical Guidelines & Best Practices
Clinical RelevanceDOI 3 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This review looks at ways to treat myofascial pain syndrome, a common problem causing muscle pain from trigger points.

Bottom line

Worth discussing with your provider if you have chronic muscle pain.

Preliminary evidence

Published

2020
6 years ago
Recent

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report ◀ this study
Expert Opinion

Study participants

up to 85% of adultsgeneral populationmore common in women

patients with chronic pain disorders

Words decoded

Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)
— A musculoskeletal pain condition that comes from tight regions in muscles and connective tissue, causing trigger points.
Trigger Points
— Sensitive spots in muscles that can cause pain in other areas of the body.
Neuropathic Pain
— Pain caused by damage or disease affecting the nerves.

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a major cause of chronic pain affecting millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by trigger points within muscles or fascia that create regional pain patterns. Despite being extremely common — affecting 30-93% of patients seeking care for musculoskeletal pain — MPS remains poorly understood and lacks standardized diagnostic criteria. This creates challenges for healthcare providers trying to diagnose and treat this complex condition effectively.

What They Did

This comprehensive review examined the current state of knowledge about MPS, including its epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. The authors systematically reviewed published research on various treatment modalities including topical anesthetics, trigger point injections, botulinum toxin type A, acupuncture, kinesiotaping, TENS, and other emerging therapies. They analyzed multiple studies to evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment approach.

What They Found

MPS affects people of all ages but is most common between ages 27-50, with no clear gender preference. The pathophysiology involves dysfunction at neuromuscular junctions leading to excessive acetylcholine release and muscle contraction. Diagnosis remains challenging due to lack of standardized criteria, though most agree on the presence of trigger points, pain on palpation, referred pain patterns, and local twitch response as key features. Treatment effectiveness varies widely: topical anesthetics showed consistent benefits across studies; trigger point injections with local anesthetics were effective but not superior to dry needling or saline; botulinum toxin results were mixed, with some studies showing benefit while others found no difference from placebo; acupuncture, kinesiotaping, and TENS showed promise, particularly when combined with other therapies.

What This Means

Patients with MPS have multiple treatment options available, but there is no single "best" approach. The evidence suggests that a multimodal treatment strategy combining different therapies may be most effective. Healthcare providers should start with less invasive options like topical treatments and physical therapy before progressing to more invasive procedures. The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria remains a significant challenge that needs urgent attention from the medical community.

More high-quality research is needed to establish clear treatment guidelines and help clinicians make evidence-based decisions for their patients with MPS.

75/100
Evidence StrengthStrong
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
Prevalence in Pain Clinics
30-93%
Of Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
85%
US Adults with Chronic Pain
100M+

Key Findings

FindingDetailImpact
MPS affects 30-93% of patients presenting to pain clinicsPrevalence varies widely due to lack of standardized diagnostic criteriaHigh
Topical anesthetics consistently effective across studiesLidocaine patches showed significant improvement in pain, function, and quality of lifeHigh
Trigger point injections effective but not superior to alternativesLocal anesthetic injections improved pain but similar effectiveness to dry needling or salineMedium
Botulinum toxin results highly variableMixed findings across studies, with effectiveness varying by location and durationMedium
Combination therapies appear most promisingAcupuncture, kinesiotaping, and TENS showed better results when combined with other treatmentsHigh
Standardized diagnostic criteria urgently neededCurrent diagnosis relies heavily on clinical judgment due to conflicting criteriaHigh
Study Methodology
Study Design
Comprehensive narrative review
Sample Size
N/A
Duration
Literature review examining multiple studies
Population
Patients with myofascial pain syndrome across various studies
Outcome Measures
Pain intensity · Functional outcomes · Quality of life · Treatment effectiveness

Strengths

  • Comprehensive coverage of current treatment modalities
  • Systematic examination of evidence quality
  • Clear identification of research gaps and clinical needs
  • Practical clinical recommendations provided

Limitations

  • Narrative review rather than systematic review or meta-analysis
  • No standardized quality assessment of included studies
  • Limited ability to provide definitive treatment recommendations
  • Heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. Myofascial pain syndrome is very common but can be effectively treated with multiple approaches

  2. Starting with less invasive treatments like topical medications and physical therapy is usually recommended

  3. Combining different treatments often works better than using just one approach

  4. Working with healthcare providers to find the right combination of treatments for your specific situation is important

  5. While there's no single 'best' treatment, most people can find significant relief with proper management

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Update on Clinical Characteristics, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Steen et al.·Muscle & Nerve·2025

This comprehensive narrative review synthesizes current evidence on myofascial pain syndrome, finding sufficient support only for local anesthetic injections while highlighting that many common treatments lack adequate evidence.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial pain – A major player in musculoskeletal pain

Lam et al.·Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology·2024

Comprehensive review of myofascial pain syndrome, affecting 20-95% of musculoskeletal pain patients. Emphasizes multimodal treatment approaches and need for early recognition.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, César & Nijs, Jo·Journal of Pain Research·2019

This review examines trigger point dry needling mechanisms and proposes integrating it with pain neuroscience education rather than using it as standalone treatment. Evidence shows dry needling works through peripheral and central nervous system mechanisms but has only moderate short-term effects.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCase-Control Study

Circulating biomarkers in acute myofascial pain – A case control study

Grosman-Rimon et al.·Medicine·2016

Blood tests revealed dramatically elevated inflammatory markers in acute myofascial pain patients compared to healthy controls. This study suggests MPS causes systemic inflammation that could potentially be used for diagnosis.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →