• Narrative Review
  • Clinical Guidelines & Best Practices
Clinical RelevanceDOI 4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

Myofascial pain syndrome is a common cause of musculoskeletal pain, affecting specific muscle regions and causing referred pain; effective treatment often involves a multimodal approach.

Bottom line

Myofascial pain syndrome is a complex condition that may require a multimodal treatment approach; worth discussing with your provider.

Moderate evidence

Published

2024
2 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report ◀ this study
Expert Opinion

Study participants

100%27–50more common among females

patients with musculoskeletal pain

Words decoded

Myofascial pain syndrome
— A type of pain that comes from muscles and the connective tissue around them, often causing pain in other areas of the body too.
Trigger points
— Specific spots in the muscle that are very sensitive to touch and can cause pain in other parts of the body.
Multimodal treatment
— Using more than one type of treatment to address a health issue, like combining physical therapy with medication.

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain, affecting 20-95% of patients presenting to general medicine and pain management centers. Despite its prevalence, MPS remains poorly understood and often undertreated. The condition involves trigger points - localized painful areas in skeletal muscle containing taut bands that can cause referred pain patterns. MPS can exist independently or alongside other musculoskeletal conditions, making diagnosis and treatment challenging.

The economic and personal burden of this condition is substantial, yet there's limited consensus on optimal treatment approaches.

What They Did

The authors conducted a comprehensive narrative review examining the current understanding of myofascial pain syndrome. They analyzed existing literature on prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and evidence-based treatments. The review covers regional variations of MPS (cervical, lumbar, abdominal, pelvic), explores the relationship between trigger points and other pain conditions, and evaluates multiple treatment modalities including physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, trigger point injections, botulinum toxin, and behavioral interventions. They also examined the distinction between MPS and fibromyalgia, addressing common diagnostic confusion.

What They Found

The prevalence of MPS varies widely (20-95%) depending on the population studied, with peak occurrence between ages 27-50 years. Trigger points can be active (causing spontaneous pain) or latent (asymptomatic but painful when pressed). The pathophysiology involves abnormal motor end plate function with irregular acetylcholine release, creating sustained muscle contraction and local ischemia. This leads to release of sensitizing substances that perpetuate the pain cycle.

Treatment effectiveness varies significantly, with multimodal approaches showing the best outcomes. Physical therapy and trigger point injections are commonly used, but evidence for superiority of specific techniques is limited. Botulinum toxin shows promise for refractory cases but evidence remains mixed.

What This Means

This review highlights that MPS is a major contributor to musculoskeletal pain that requires early recognition and comprehensive treatment. Clinicians should use multimodal approaches combining physical therapy, patient education, ergonomic correction, and when appropriate, injection therapy. The condition is distinct from fibromyalgia and requires different treatment strategies. More high-quality research is urgently needed to establish evidence-based treatment protocols, particularly for injection techniques and emerging therapies like botulinum toxin.

Early intervention with comprehensive care appears crucial for optimal outcomes, as patients with MPS tend to have worse outcomes than those with discrete musculoskeletal pathology.

70/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
MPS Prevalence in Pain Clinics
20-95%
Responsible for Back Pain
85%
Latent Trigger Points in Healthy Adults
45-55%

Key Findings

FindingDetailImpact
MPS affects 20-95% of patients presenting to pain clinicsWide prevalence range reflects diagnostic challenges and patient population variationsHigh
Trigger points involve abnormal motor end plate functionIrregular acetylcholine release creates sustained muscle contraction and local ischemiaHigh
Multimodal treatment approach is most effectiveCombination of physical therapy, injections, and patient education shows best outcomesHigh
MPS is distinct from fibromyalgiaLocalized trigger points with referred pain patterns vs widespread tender pointsMedium
Botulinum toxin shows promise for refractory casesLimited evidence but may be considered when other treatments failMedium
Early intervention is crucial for optimal outcomesPatients with MPS tend to do worse than those with discrete musculoskeletal pathologyHigh
Study Methodology
Study Design
Comprehensive narrative review
Sample Size
Multiple studies reviewed
Duration
Literature spanning multiple decades
Population
Patients with myofascial pain syndrome and trigger points
Outcome Measures
Prevalence studies · Treatment outcomes · Pathophysiology research

Strengths

  • Comprehensive coverage of all aspects of myofascial pain syndrome
  • Clear distinction between MPS and fibromyalgia
  • Practical clinical guidance for diagnosis and treatment
  • Evidence-based recommendations with critical analysis

Limitations

  • Narrative review without systematic methodology
  • Limited high-quality evidence for many treatment modalities
  • Wide variation in prevalence estimates reflects diagnostic challenges
  • Lack of standardized diagnostic criteria hampers research

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. Myofascial pain syndrome is very common and affects up to 95% of people with muscle pain

  2. The condition involves trigger points in muscles that can cause pain in other areas of your body

  3. Treatment works best when multiple approaches are used together, including physical therapy and education

  4. Early treatment is important - waiting can make the condition harder to treat

  5. This condition is different from fibromyalgia and requires different treatment approaches

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Update on Clinical Characteristics, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Steen et al.·Muscle & Nerve·2025

This comprehensive narrative review synthesizes current evidence on myofascial pain syndrome, finding sufficient support only for local anesthetic injections while highlighting that many common treatments lack adequate evidence.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome

Urits et al.·Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology·2020

This comprehensive review examines treatment options for myofascial pain syndrome, finding that multimodal approaches combining different therapies may be most effective. Despite affecting 30-93% of patients with musculoskeletal pain, standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines are sti

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, César & Nijs, Jo·Journal of Pain Research·2019

This review examines trigger point dry needling mechanisms and proposes integrating it with pain neuroscience education rather than using it as standalone treatment. Evidence shows dry needling works through peripheral and central nervous system mechanisms but has only moderate short-term effects.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCase-Control Study

Circulating biomarkers in acute myofascial pain – A case control study

Grosman-Rimon et al.·Medicine·2016

Blood tests revealed dramatically elevated inflammatory markers in acute myofascial pain patients compared to healthy controls. This study suggests MPS causes systemic inflammation that could potentially be used for diagnosis.

Clinical Guidelines & Best PracticesRead →