• Cohort Study
  • Treatment: Dry Needling
  • Clinical Trials
Clinical RelevanceDOI 4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

Dry needling can change muscle knots in the upper trapezius muscle and reduce chronic pain.

Bottom line

Worth discussing with your provider if you have chronic upper trapezius pain.

Moderate evidence

Published

2015
11 years ago
Older study

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort ◀ this study
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Study participants

n=5220-6241.1% men, 58.9% women

adults with neck or shoulder pain and active myofascial trigger points

Words decoded

MTrP
— Myofascial trigger point, a spot in the muscle that is sensitive to touch and can cause pain.
MPS
— Myofascial pain syndrome, a common pain condition that involves muscle knots and pain.

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common condition affecting 15% of general medical visits, causing significant functional limitations and reduced quality of life. While dry needling is frequently used to treat active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), the relationship between pain reduction and changes in trigger point status has never been studied systematically. This research addresses a fundamental question in myofascial pain treatment: does successful dry needling both reduce pain and change the physical characteristics of trigger points?

What They Did

Researchers conducted a prospective study of 52 adults with chronic neck/shoulder pain lasting more than 3 months and active trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Participants received three weekly dry needling treatments targeting a single active trigger point. Two experienced clinicians with demonstrated inter-rater reliability performed all evaluations and treatments using standardized techniques. Pain was measured using three different tools: visual analog scale (VAS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and pressure pain threshold (PPT).

Trigger points were classified as active (spontaneously painful), latent (painful only when pressed), or resolved (no palpable nodule). Secondary measures included cervical range of motion, mood questionnaires, and disability assessments.

What They Found

The results were striking: 41 of 52 participants (79%) showed improvement in trigger point status from active to either latent or completely resolved. Pain reduction was significant across all measures, with VAS scores dropping by an average of 2.87 points in responders versus only 1.00 points in non-responders (p<0.001). The Brief Pain Inventory scores improved significantly in responders but not non-responders. Cervical range of motion improved, particularly rotational asymmetry and side-bending.

Participants also showed significant improvements in mental health, physical functioning, and disability scores. The study demonstrated a clear correlation between trigger point status change and pain reduction.

What This Means

This landmark study provides the first objective evidence that dry needling not only reduces pain but actually changes the physical status of trigger points. The findings support the theory that trigger points are legitimate treatment targets, not just areas to needle for pain relief. For patients, this means dry needling offers both immediate pain relief and lasting structural changes to problematic trigger points. For clinicians, the study validates the importance of targeting specific trigger points and suggests that successful treatment should result in both pain reduction and trigger point resolution.

The research also highlights the value of using multiple pain assessment tools and tracking objective changes in trigger point status to evaluate treatment success.

68/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
Trigger Point Improvement
79%
VAS Pain Reduction (Responders)
2.87
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Participants Improved
41
Enrolled

52

Randomized
n=52

Treatment Group

3 weekly dry needling sessions

Results Comparison

VAS Pain Reduction (0-10 scale)

points
Responders-2.87 points
Non-Responders-1 points

Key Findings

FindingDetailImpact
79% of participants had trigger point status improvement41 of 52 subjects changed from active trigger points to latent or resolved statusHigh
Pain reduction strongly correlated with trigger point changesResponders had 2.87-point VAS reduction vs 1.00 in non-responders (p<0.001)High
Cervical range of motion improved significantlyRotational asymmetry improved in both unilateral (p=0.001) and bilateral (p=0.021) casesMedium
Multiple functional improvements observedMental health, physical functioning, and disability scores all improved significantlyMedium
No correlation between twitch response and outcomesLocal twitch response achieved in 50-70% of treatments but didn't predict successLow
Study Methodology
Study Design
Prospective, non-randomized, controlled interventional study
Sample Size
52
Duration
3 weeks treatment plus follow-up
Population
Adults with chronic neck/shoulder pain >3 months and active trigger points
Outcome Measures
Visual Analog Scale · Brief Pain Inventory · Pressure Pain Threshold · Trigger point palpation status · Cervical ROM · SF-36 · Oswestry Disability Index

Strengths

  • First study to measure both pain reduction and objective trigger point changes
  • Used multiple validated pain assessment tools
  • Demonstrated inter-rater reliability between treating clinicians
  • Comprehensive assessment including functional outcomes

Limitations

  • Non-randomized, uncontrolled design without placebo group
  • Same clinicians who treated also evaluated outcomes (potential bias)
  • Single muscle group studied (upper trapezius only)
  • No long-term follow-up beyond 3 weeks

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. Dry needling can both reduce pain and change the physical status of trigger points in most people

  2. Treatment typically requires 3 weekly sessions to see significant improvement

  3. Success can be measured not just by how you feel, but by actual changes in your trigger points

  4. Improvements often include better neck movement and overall function

  5. The treatment appears to address the underlying muscle problem, not just mask pain

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from PMR

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Alhakami et al.·Medicina·2025

This systematic review of 8 randomized trials found that both deep and superficial dry needling provide similar short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with neck pain and myofascial trigger points. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two needling depths.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCross-Sectional Study

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists

Brady et al.·Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy·2014

First comprehensive safety study of trigger point dry needling found mild adverse events in 19% of treatments but no serious complications. Common side effects included bleeding, bruising, and temporary pain.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kalichman, Leonid & Vulfsons, Simon·Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine·2010

Clinical review confirming dry needling as an effective, low-risk treatment for myofascial pain affecting up to 10% of adults. Deep needling shows superior long-term results compared to superficial techniques.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of static, classical, and sham dry needling on muscle properties and autonomic nervous system activity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Olaniszyn et al.·Complementary Therapies in Medicine·2026

Classical dynamic dry needling with pistoning and local twitch response elicitation produced greater short-term improvements in pressure pain threshold, muscle stiffness, tone, and perfusion compared to static needling or sham in upper trapezius myofascial pain. Static needling was largely indistinguishable from sham on most outcomes.

Dry NeedlingRead →