Patient-friendly summary
If you read nothing else
Bottom line
Dry needling seems safe with a low risk of serious side effects, but discuss with your provider if considering this treatment.
Moderate evidenceAsk your provider
- What are the potential side effects of dry needling?
- What can I expect after the treatment in terms of side effects?
- How experienced are you with dry needling?
Call your doctor if
- Severe pain that doesn't go away
- Signs of infection like redness or swelling
General warning signs for this condition, not side effects of the studied treatment. If any apply to you, contact a clinician promptly.
Try this week
- Ask your provider about the possible side effects of dry needling.
- Understand that while mild side effects are common, serious ones are rare.
Possible side effects
- bruising(7.55%)
- bleeding(4.65%)
- pain during treatment(3.01%)
- pain after treatment(2.19%)
Study Summary
Background
Trigger point dry needling (TrP-DN) is commonly used by physiotherapists to treat myofascial pain, but little research existed on its safety profile. This study addressed the critical need to understand adverse events associated with dry needling practice, as previous safety data came primarily from acupuncture studies, which differ significantly in technique and depth of needle insertion. Understanding safety is essential for informed consent and clinical decision-making.
What They Did
Researchers conducted a 10-month prospective survey of 39 physiotherapists in Ireland who had completed standardized trigger point dry needling training through the David G Simons Academy. Participating physiotherapists recorded all adverse events using two forms: one for mild events (short-term, non-serious) and another for significant events (serious, requiring treatment). The study aimed to collect data on over 10,000 treatments to identify even rare adverse events. Physiotherapists recorded detailed information about each treatment session and any unwanted effects, no matter how minor.
What They Found
Over 7,629 dry needling treatments, 1,463 mild adverse events occurred, representing 19.18% of all treatments. No significant adverse events were reported, giving an estimated upper risk rate of ≤0.04% for serious complications. The most common adverse events were bleeding (7.55% of treatments), bruising (4.65%), pain during treatment (3.01%), and pain after treatment (2.19%). Uncommon events included symptom aggravation (0.88%), drowsiness (0.26%), feeling faint (0.22%), headache (0.14%), and nausea (0.13%).
Rare events included fatigue, altered emotions, shaking, itching, claustrophobia, and numbness, each occurring in less than 0.04% of treatments.
What This Means
This study provides the first comprehensive safety data for trigger point dry needling, showing that while mild adverse events are very common (nearly 1 in 5 treatments), serious complications are extremely rare. The findings suggest dry needling has a favorable safety profile compared to many over-the-counter pain medications. For patients, this means they can expect minor side effects like brief bleeding or bruising in about 1 in 5 treatments, but serious complications are highly unlikely. For clinicians, these data provide evidence-based information for informed consent discussions and support the safety of dry needling when performed by properly trained practitioners.
Key Findings
| Finding | Detail | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| No serious adverse events in 7,629 treatments | Zero significant complications with estimated upper risk rate ≤0.04% | High |
| Bleeding most common adverse event | Occurred in 7.55% of treatments (576 cases) | Medium |
| All adverse events were mild and transient | 19.18% of treatments had mild AEs but none required medical intervention | High |
| Wide variation in AE reporting between practitioners | Rates ranged from 3.13 to 93.1 per 100 treatments among different physiotherapists | Medium |
| Deep dry needling used in majority of treatments | 82.7% of treatments used deep needling, 17.3% used superficial needling | Low |
Zero significant complications with estimated upper risk rate ≤0.04%
Occurred in 7.55% of treatments (576 cases)
19.18% of treatments had mild AEs but none required medical intervention
Rates ranged from 3.13 to 93.1 per 100 treatments among different physiotherapists
82.7% of treatments used deep needling, 17.3% used superficial needling
Strengths
- First comprehensive prospective safety study of dry needling
- Large sample size with over 7,600 treatments
- Standardized training of participating practitioners
- Prospective design minimized recall bias
Limitations
- No significant AEs occurred, so risk estimates are based on statistical calculations
- Wide variation in AE reporting suggests possible inconsistent definitions
- Single country study with specific training protocol may limit generalizability
- Potential under-reporting due to practitioner concerns about liability
Key Takeaways for Patients
What This Means for You
- 01Dry needling is very safe when performed by properly trained practitioners
- 02Minor bleeding or bruising occurs in about 1 in 5 treatments but resolves quickly
- 03Serious complications are extremely rare (less than 1 in 2,500 treatments)
- 04Temporary pain during or after treatment is normal and expected
- 05Most side effects are mild and don't interfere with daily activities
Read the Full Paper
Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
View Full Study