• Narrative Review
  • Pain Science & Central Sensitization
Clinical RelevanceDOI 4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This review paper explores how our understanding of pain has evolved, focusing on windup and central sensitization.

Bottom line

Understanding windup and central sensitization can help in managing chronic pain.

Moderate evidence

Words decoded

Nociceptor
— a pain sensor in your body that sends signals to your brain when something potentially harmful happens.
C-fibers
— tiny nerves that carry pain signals from your body to your spinal cord.
NMDA receptor
— a type of receptor in your brain that plays a role in how you feel pain.

How it works

  1. 1
    Windup starts
    When small nerves called C-fibers are stimulated repeatedly, they cause spinal neurons to respond more and more strongly.
  2. 2
    Central sensitization occurs
    After an injury, your spinal neurons become more sensitive to all signals, not just the painful ones, causing an increase in pain.

Published

2022
4 years ago
Recent

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report ◀ this study
Expert Opinion

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Pain was once thought to be a simple relay from injury to brain, but this understanding has been revolutionized by the discovery that the spinal cord actively processes and can amplify pain signals. This paper traces the historical path to discovering two fundamental pain mechanisms: windup and central sensitization. These discoveries emerged from early 1960s experiments showing that repetitive stimulation of small nerve fibers (C-fibers) could cause spinal neurons to respond with increasingly longer bursts of activity. This challenged the prevailing view that pain transmission was fixed and unchanging.

Understanding these mechanisms has been crucial for developing modern pain treatments and explaining why some people develop chronic pain after injury.

What They Did

This is a historical review by Dr. Lorne Mendell, one of the original discoverers of windup. He traces the scientific journey from early nerve fiber research in the 1900s through the 1960s discovery of windup, to the 1980s identification of central sensitization. The review examines key experiments that showed how C-fibers (small, slow nerve fibers that carry pain signals) could cause spinal neurons to become increasingly active with repeated stimulation.

Later work revealed that injury could sensitize the entire spinal pain processing system, making it hyperresponsive to both painful and normally non-painful stimuli.

What They Found

The research revealed that windup occurs when C-fibers are stimulated repetitively at rates of about 0.33Hz or faster, causing spinal neurons to discharge for progressively longer periods with each stimulus. This happens because C-fibers release both glutamate (which activates NMDA receptors) and neuropeptides like substance P (which activate neurokinin receptors), creating slow, long-lasting excitation that builds up with repetition. Central sensitization, discovered about 15 years later, showed that tissue injury could make the entire spinal pain system hypersensitive for hours or days. Both processes depend on the same molecular mechanisms - NMDA and neurokinin receptors - but windup requires synchronized nerve volleys while central sensitization can occur from diffuse injury signals.

What This Means

These discoveries fundamentally changed pain medicine by showing that the spinal cord is not a passive relay but an active processor that can amplify pain signals. This explains many chronic pain conditions where people experience pain that seems disproportionate to their injury, or develop pain sensitivity in areas away from the original injury site. The identification of NMDA and neurokinin receptors as key players has led to new drug targets for treating chronic pain. For patients, this research validates that their pain experience can be real and severe even when tissue damage appears minimal - the nervous system itself has become hypersensitive.

For clinicians, it emphasizes the importance of early, aggressive pain control to prevent the development of central sensitization and chronic pain states.

85/100
Evidence StrengthStrong
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
Minimum Rate for Windup
0.33Hz
Facilitation Duration
3 seconds
Gap Between Discoveries
15 years

Key Findings

FindingDetailImpact
Windup requires repetitive C-fiber stimulation at 0.33Hz or fasterEach stimulus evokes facilitation lasting about 3 seconds, allowing temporal summationHigh
Both windup and central sensitization depend on NMDA and neurokinin receptorsC-fibers release glutamate and substance P, activating these receptor systemsHigh
Central sensitization can occur without synchronized nerve volleysUnlike windup, requires only diffuse nociceptor activation from injuryHigh
Wide dynamic range neurons respond to both touch and painThese spinal neurons increase firing when skin is pinched versus brushedMedium
Windup correlates with increased pain in humansRepetitive C-fiber stimulation produces progressively more intense painHigh
Study Methodology
Study Design
Historical narrative review
Sample Size
N/A
Duration
Research spanning 60+ years
Population
Historical data from animal models and human subjects
Outcome Measures
Electrophysiological recordings · Pharmacological studies · Human psychophysical studies

Strengths

  • Authoritative first-person account from original discoverer
  • Comprehensive historical perspective spanning 60+ years
  • Clear explanation of complex molecular mechanisms
  • Strong integration of animal and human research

Limitations

  • Narrative review without systematic literature search
  • Limited discussion of recent advances beyond basic mechanisms
  • Focus primarily on historical rather than clinical applications
  • Single author perspective may introduce bias

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. Your spinal cord can amplify pain signals, making pain feel worse than the actual tissue damage

  2. This explains why some people develop chronic pain that seems out of proportion to their injury

  3. Early, effective pain treatment may help prevent your nervous system from becoming hypersensitive

  4. Pain that spreads beyond the original injury site may be due to spinal cord sensitization

  5. These discoveries have led to new targets for developing better pain medications

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Frontiers in Pain Research

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianjun Liu et al.·Frontiers in Psychology·2026

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs found that CBT-based interventions produce small-to-moderate reductions in pain intensity and the largest, most consistent reductions in pain catastrophizing for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Reducing Pain, Disability, Kinesiophobia, and Catastrophizing in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luisa Medina-Viedma et al.·Medical Sciences (Basel)·2025

A meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (810 patients) found that pain neuroscience education, usually added to exercise or physiotherapy, may reduce pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing in chronic low back pain, though the authors urge caution given small trials and heterogeneity.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Pain science education and exercise interventions for people with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review, content and meta-analysis

Anna Louise Hurley-Wallace et al.·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders·2025

A systematic review and component network meta-analysis finding that pain science education had little-to-no effect on pain or function in knee/hip osteoarthritis but improved catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and self-efficacy, especially when paired with exercise.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Central Sensitization: A Systematic Review

Beatrice Lepri et al.·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health·2023

A systematic review of 15 RCTs found that pain neuroscience education may improve pain, disability, and psychosocial factors in chronic musculoskeletal pain with central sensitization, particularly when combined with exercise or manual therapy and delivered one-to-one.

Central SensitizationRead →