• Meta-analysis
  • Treatment: Trigger Point Injection
  • Systematic Reviews & Meta-analyses
Clinical RelevanceDOI 3 min read
Jump to:

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain affects up to 85% of pain clinic patients and is characterized by painful trigger points in muscle. Two common injection treatments are used: local anesthetics (like lidocaine) and botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A). While both are widely used clinically, there has been no comprehensive comparison of their effectiveness. This creates uncertainty for doctors and patients about which injection type works better for myofascial pain.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, searching three major medical databases for studies comparing local anesthetic and BTX-A injections for myofascial pain. They included 33 studies with various follow-up periods from immediately after injection up to 24 weeks later. The team analyzed pain intensity scores and compared effectiveness between the two injection types across different time periods, muscle locations, and treatment protocols.

What They Found

Local anesthetic injections consistently outperformed BTX-A injections for reducing pain intensity. Local anesthetics showed large effect sizes favoring treatment at 1-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks, 7-8 weeks, and 16 weeks after injection. BTX-A injections showed negligible or small effect sizes throughout most follow-up periods, only showing modest benefits at 18 and 24 weeks. Multiple sessions of local anesthetics were more effective than single sessions.

Local anesthetics worked particularly well in temporomandibular muscles and when used for widespread muscle pain. The analysis included over 1,000 patients across all studies.

What This Means

For patients with myofascial trigger points, local anesthetic injections appear to provide better and more consistent pain relief compared to botulinum toxin injections. The benefits of local anesthetics are seen quickly and last for several months. Multiple injection sessions may provide even better results. This evidence can help doctors make more informed treatment decisions and may lead to updated clinical guidelines.

However, the location of injection and individual patient factors may influence which treatment works best for each person.

85/100
Evidence StrengthStrong
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
Studies Included
33
Overall Effect Size at 3-4 weeks
-0.37
Statistical Significance
p=0.02
Enrolled

1056

Randomized
n=18

Local Anesthetic Studies

Various local anesthetic injections

n=16

BTX-A Studies

Botulinum toxin-A injections

Results Comparison

Effect Size at 3-4 Weeks

SMD
Local Anesthetic-1.01 SMD
BTX-A0 SMD

Key Findings

FindingDetailImpact
Local anesthetics showed large effect sizes for pain reduction at multiple time pointsSignificant benefits at 1-2 weeks (SMD -0.96), 3-4 weeks (SMD -1.01), and 16 weeks (SMD -1.33)High
BTX-A injections showed minimal effectiveness throughout most follow-up periodsNegligible effect sizes until 18-24 weeks, with only modest benefits emerging laterHigh
Multiple local anesthetic sessions more effective than single sessionsSingle session SMD -0.51 vs multiple sessions SMD -0.86, both favoring treatmentMedium
Location of injection influences effectivenessLocal anesthetics most effective in temporomandibular muscles (SMD -1.01) and widespread locations (SMD -1.41)Medium
High heterogeneity between studies suggests variable treatment protocolsI² values >50% for most analyses, indicating significant differences in study methods and patient populationsMedium
Study Methodology
Study Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and controlled trials
Sample Size
33
Duration
Studies included follow-up from immediate to 24 weeks post-injection
Population
Patients with myofascial pain disorders confirmed by expert assessment
Outcome Measures
Visual analog scale (VAS) · Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) · Patient-reported pain intensity

Strengths

  • Comprehensive search of multiple databases with broad inclusion criteria
  • Large number of included studies (33) with over 1,000 participants
  • Rigorous methodology following PRISMA guidelines
  • Multiple subgroup analyses examining different variables
  • Long follow-up periods up to 24 weeks

Limitations

  • High heterogeneity between studies limits generalizability
  • Varied comparison groups including non-injection controls
  • Limited to English language studies only
  • Different local anesthetic types and concentrations used across studies
  • Most BTX-A studies used single injection sessions only

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. Local anesthetic injections appear more effective than botulinum toxin for trigger point pain

  2. Pain relief from local anesthetics can be seen quickly and may last several months

  3. Multiple injection sessions may provide better results than single treatments

  4. The location of your trigger points may influence which treatment works best

  5. Both injection types have been shown to be generally safe with temporary side effects

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Clinical Journal of Pain

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Comparative effectiveness of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for myofascial pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Liu et al.·International Journal of Surgery·2024

Network meta-analysis of 40 RCTs found manual therapy, laser therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy most effective for reducing pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome. These three treatments showed benefits across pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and functional outcomes comp

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain—An Umbrella Review

Chys et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2023

This umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews found strong evidence that dry needling provides superior short-term pain reduction compared to sham treatments across all body regions. DN is equally effective to other treatments and may provide additional benefit when combined with conventional physio

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →