Randomized Controlled TrialTreatment: Manual TherapyClinical TrialsClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

Study participants

n=150university-aged80 males, 70 females

University students and recreationally active individuals with tender spots in plantar flexor muscles

If you read nothing else

Rolling massage on tender spots in muscles can quickly increase how much pressure you can feel before it hurts, but the effect doesn't last long.

Bottom line

This study's results are worth discussing with your provider if you're looking for quick pain relief methods.

Preliminary evidence

Published

2015
11 years ago
Older study

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT ◀ this study
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Words decoded

Pressure pain threshold (PPT)
— The least amount of pressure that causes pain, measured with a special tool called an algometer.
Myofascial release
— Techniques to relieve muscle tension and pain by applying pressure to the connective tissue surrounding muscles.
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain and tender spots in muscles are common problems that can significantly impact quality of life. Rolling massage using foam rollers or handheld devices has become increasingly popular as a self-treatment method, but the mechanisms behind its pain-relieving effects weren't well understood. This study aimed to determine whether rolling massage could reduce pain sensitivity in people with tender spots in their calf muscles, and to explore whether the pain relief comes from local tissue effects or central nervous system changes.

What They Did

Researchers recruited 150 university-aged participants who had identified tender spots in their plantar flexor muscles (gastrocnemius or soleus). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: heavy rolling massage on the tender calf (Ipsi-R), heavy rolling massage on the opposite calf (Contra-R), light skin stroking with the roller (Sham), manual massage on the tender calf (Ipsi-M), or no treatment (Control). Each massage intervention consisted of 3 sets of 30 seconds with 30-second rest periods between sets. Pain pressure threshold was measured using a pressure algometer before treatment, immediately after (30 seconds), and up to 15 minutes post-treatment.

The pressure pain threshold indicates how much pressure someone can tolerate before feeling pain — a higher threshold means less pain sensitivity.

What They Found

All three heavy massage techniques significantly increased pain pressure threshold compared to the sham and control groups. At 30 seconds post-treatment, the ipsilateral rolling group showed a 24% increase in pain threshold, while the contralateral rolling group showed a 21% increase. Manual massage produced a smaller but still significant improvement. Remarkably, rolling massage on the opposite leg (contralateral) was nearly as effective as treating the painful leg directly, suggesting that central nervous system mechanisms play a major role.

The pain relief was temporary, with effects diminishing over the 15-minute follow-up period. The study also found that when measuring pain thresholds, the first two measurements tend to be unreliable due to sensitization effects, so multiple measurements are needed for accuracy.

What This Means

This research provides strong evidence that rolling massage can provide immediate pain relief for people with muscle tender spots. The finding that massaging the opposite leg was nearly as effective as direct treatment suggests that the benefits come primarily from activating the body's own pain control systems in the brain and spinal cord, rather than just breaking up tissue adhesions locally. This has practical implications for treatment — people with painful areas that are difficult to reach or too sensitive to touch directly might benefit from massaging the corresponding area on the opposite side of the body. For clinicians and patients using foam rollers or massage tools, this study confirms that these techniques can provide meaningful short-term pain relief, though the effects are temporary and repeated treatments may be needed.

75/100
Evidence StrengthStrong
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
24%
Pain Threshold Increase (Ipsi-R)
21%
Pain Threshold Increase (Contra-R)
p<0.001
Statistical Significance vs Sham
0.93
Test-Retest Reliability (ICC)
Enrolled

150

Randomized
n=30

Ipsi-R (Heavy rolling)

Heavy rolling massage on tender calf

n=30

Contra-R (Contralateral)

Heavy rolling massage on opposite calf

n=30

Ipsi-M (Manual)

Manual massage on tender calf

n=30

Sham

Light skin stroking with roller

n=30

Control

No treatment

Results Comparison

Pain Pressure Threshold Increase (%)

%
Ipsi-R24 %
Contra-R21 %
Ipsi-M15 %
Sham-5 %
Control0 %

Key Findings

Heavy rolling massage increased pain pressure threshold by 24%High

Ipsilateral rolling massage showed significant improvement compared to sham and control groups (p<0.001)

Contralateral rolling massage was nearly as effective as direct treatmentHigh

Opposite leg treatment produced 21% improvement, suggesting central pain modulation mechanisms

Manual massage produced moderate but significant pain reliefMedium

10.9% improvement over 15 minutes compared to control group

Pain relief effects were transientMedium

Significant decline in pain threshold from 30 seconds to 15 minutes post-intervention

Multiple pain threshold measurements needed for reliabilityMedium

First two measurements were significantly higher than subsequent trials due to sensitization

Light massage showed decreased pain thresholdLow

Sham group demonstrated reduced pain tolerance compared to heavy massage interventions

Study Methodology
Study Design
Randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial
Sample Size
150
Duration
Single session with 15-minute follow-up
Population
University-aged adults with plantar flexor muscle tender spots
Outcome Measures
Pressure pain threshold via algometer · Visual analogue scale · Intraclass correlation coefficient

Strengths

  • Large sample size with 150 participants across five groups
  • Randomized, single-blinded design to minimize bias
  • Multiple intervention groups allowing direct comparison of techniques
  • Validated outcome measures with excellent reliability (ICC=0.93)
  • Novel finding about contralateral effects supporting central mechanisms

Limitations

  • Short intervention duration (3 sets of 30 seconds) may not reflect optimal treatment
  • Brief follow-up period (15 minutes) doesn't assess longer-term effects
  • Single session study doesn't examine cumulative effects of repeated treatments
  • University-aged population limits generalizability to other age groups
  • Participants were volunteers who may have positive expectations about massage benefits

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Firm pressure rolling massage can immediately reduce pain sensitivity in muscle tender spots by about 24%
  2. 02Massaging the corresponding muscle on the opposite side of your body can be nearly as effective as treating the painful area directly
  3. 03The pain relief from rolling massage is temporary, lasting less than 15 minutes, so repeated treatments may be needed
  4. 04Light pressure or gentle stroking with a roller may actually increase pain sensitivity rather than help
  5. 05Rolling massage appears to work primarily by activating your body's natural pain control systems rather than just breaking up tissue adhesions

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Combined effectiveness of extracorporeal radial shockwave therapy and ultrasound-guided trigger point injection of lidocaine in upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome

Anwar et al.·American Journal of Translational Research·2022

This randomized trial of 45 participants found that combining radial shockwave therapy with ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection was more effective than shockwave alone for treating upper trapezius trigger points. The combination therapy provided superior pain relief and reduced muscle stiffness at

Clinical TrialsRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single‑blinded study

Rajfur et al.·Scientific Reports·2022

This randomized trial tested a novel dry needling approach in 40 chronic low back pain patients. The dry needling group achieved substantial, sustained pain relief and functional improvement compared to sham treatment.

Clinical TrialsRead →
●●●●○ StrongSystematic Review

Myofascial Release for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wu et al.·Frontiers in Medicine·2021

This systematic review found that myofascial release significantly reduces pain and improves physical function in patients with chronic low back pain. However, it showed no benefits for quality of life, balance, or mental health outcomes.

Manual TherapyRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Optimal duration of stretching exercise in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Mansoori et al.·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine·2021

This randomized controlled trial found that 30-second stretches optimally reduced pain in chronic myofascial pain syndrome while avoiding nerve dysfunction. Longer 60-second stretches impaired neural function despite similar pain relief benefits.

Clinical TrialsRead →