Cohort StudyTreatment: Trigger Point InjectionClinical RelevanceDOI
5 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain, with episodes triggered by myofascial trigger points. While various physical therapies, medications, and even botulinum toxin can help many patients, a subset of individuals remains dissatisfied with conventional treatments. Interfascial hydrodissection (IH), sometimes called "Liquid Knife," has emerged as a novel approach that targets fascial adhesions between muscles by injecting solution into interfascial spaces. Dextrose solutions have shown promise in prolotherapy and nerve hydrodissection for chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but the efficacy of 10% dextrose specifically for IH in MPS had not been previously evaluated.

This study aimed to fill that gap by examining whether ultrasound-guided 10% dextrose interfascial hydrodissection could reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with refractory MPS.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 95 patients with refractory MPS treated at their Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic between June 2022 and June 2024. All patients had failed to respond to conventional treatments including medical therapy, physical therapy, and manual therapy, and had Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of 5 or higher with symptom duration of at least 2 months. Patients received ultrasound-guided injections of a premixed solution containing 10% dextrose (prepared from 50% dextrose 1 mL, 2% lidocaine 2 mL, and 0.9% sodium chloride 2 mL). Under real-time ultrasound guidance using an in-plane approach, 5 mL of the solution was slowly injected into the fascial space beneath each trigger point, with successful injection confirmed by visible separation of fascial layers.

Patients could receive up to 3 weekly injections if pain remained above 3 on the NRS. All patients were also instructed to perform daily self-stretching exercises. Outcomes were assessed by a blinded evaluator at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after the final injection, measuring NRS pain scores at rest, at night, and during exercise, as well as EQ-5D-5L quality of life dimensions.

What They Found

The study found significant pain reduction following treatment. Among 95 patients, 79 (83.1%) reported significant relief after the initial treatment, and at 12-week follow-up, 67 patients (70.5%) continued to report satisfactory pain relief with NRS scores of 3 or lower. NRS scores showed statistically significant decreases at both 4-week and 12-week follow-ups compared to baseline across all three conditions: at rest (median 5.0 to 2.0), at night (median 6.0 to 2.0), and during exercise (median 6.0 to 2.0), with P < .05 for all comparisons. However, no significant differences were found between the 4-week and 12-week time points, suggesting sustained rather than deteriorating effects.

For quality of life, the EQ-5D-5L showed no significant changes in mobility, self-care, or usual activities (P > .05), but significant improvements in pain/discomfort (from mean 3.17 to 1.57 at 12 weeks) and anxiety/depression (from mean 2.48 to 1.54 at 12 weeks), both with P < .05. Adverse effects were minimal and self-limited, consisting only of occasional injection-related pain and minimal bleeding or bruising, with no serious adverse events observed.

What This Means

This study provides promising evidence that ultrasound-guided 10% dextrose interfascial hydrodissection is a safe and effective option for patients with refractory MPS who have not responded to conventional treatments. The treatment offers both short-term and sustained pain relief, with over 70% of patients maintaining satisfactory outcomes at 3 months. The improvement in anxiety and depression dimensions is particularly noteworthy, as chronic MPS is often associated with psychological distress. The lack of improvement in mobility, self-care, and usual activities likely reflects that this patient cohort, while in significant pain, did not have severe functional limitations at baseline.

For clinicians, this suggests that IH with 10% dextrose may be particularly appropriate for patients whose primary complaint is pain rather than disability. The procedure's safety profile and the use of ultrasound guidance for precision are additional advantages. However, the retrospective design, lack of control group, and relatively small sample size mean that randomized controlled trials comparing dextrose IH to sham or active treatments are still needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal treatment parameters including concentration, volume, and number of injections.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
83.1%
Significant Relief After Initial Treatment
70.5%
Satisfactory Relief at 12 Weeks
P < .05
Pain Reduction Significance
95
Total Patients Treated

Results Comparison

NRS Pain at Rest (Median)

score
Baseline5 score
12 Weeks2 score

NRS Pain at Night (Median)

score
Baseline6 score
12 Weeks2 score

EQ-5D-5L Pain/Discomfort (Mean)

score
Baseline3.17 score
12 Weeks1.57 score

Key Findings

Significant pain reduction across all measured conditionsHigh

NRS scores decreased from median 5.0-6.0 at baseline to 2.0 at both 4 and 12 weeks for rest, nocturnal, and exercise states (P < .05)

Sustained treatment response in majority of patientsHigh

83.1% reported significant relief after initial treatment, and 70.5% maintained satisfactory pain relief (NRS ≤3) at 12-week follow-up

Improved quality of life in pain and psychological dimensionsHigh

EQ-5D-5L showed significant improvement in pain/discomfort (3.17 to 1.57) and anxiety/depression (2.48 to 1.54) at 12 weeks (P < .05)

No improvement in functional dimensionsMedium

No significant differences in mobility, self-care, or usual activities between baseline and posttreatment (P > .05)

Excellent safety profileMedium

Only occasional injection-related pain and minimal bleeding/bruising observed; no serious adverse effects

Study Methodology
Study Design
Retrospective observational cohort study
Sample Size
95
Duration
June 2022 to June 2024; up to 3 weekly injections with 12-week follow-up
Population
Adults aged 18-80 with refractory MPS, NRS ≥5, symptom duration ≥2 months, who failed conventional treatments
Outcome Measures
NRS pain scores (rest, nocturnal, exercise) · EQ-5D-5L quality of life · Adverse events monitoring

Strengths

  • First study to evaluate 10% dextrose specifically for IH in MPS
  • Used ultrasound guidance for precise delivery and confirmation
  • Blinded outcome assessment for pain scores
  • Included both short-term and 12-week follow-up
  • Assessed multiple quality of life dimensions

Limitations

  • Retrospective design limits causal inference
  • No control group for comparison with sham or other treatments
  • Relatively small sample size from single center
  • Optimal dextrose concentration, volume, and injection frequency remain undetermined
  • Patient cohort had limited baseline functional impairment, restricting generalizability to more disabled patients

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01If you have myofascial pain that hasn't improved with physical therapy, medications, or other standard treatments, a specialized ultrasound-guided injection with dextrose solution may provide significant relief
  2. 02About 70% of patients in this study maintained good pain control for at least 3 months after treatment
  3. 03The procedure is generally safe with only minor, temporary side effects like brief injection pain or small bruises
  4. 04Daily stretching exercises after the injection appear important for maintaining long-term benefits
  5. 05More research is needed to compare this treatment directly against other options and determine the best dosing approach

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Medicine

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Trigger Point Injections Versus Medical Management for Acute Myofascial Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Haroutiun Hamzoian & Vahe Zograbyan·Cureus·2023

A meta-analysis of four RCTs found that trigger point injections significantly reduced acute myofascial pain compared with medical management alone (SMD -2.09; 95% CI -3.34 to -0.85; P = 0.001), though the authors flag notable heterogeneity and bias concerns.

Trigger Point InjectionRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Local Anesthetic Injections for the Short-Term Treatment of Head and Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Nouged et al.·Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache·2019

Systematic review of 884 patients found local anesthetic trigger point injections showed only modest benefits over dry needling for head and neck myofascial pain. Benefits disappeared when only high-quality studies were analyzed, suggesting bias may explain apparent advantages.

Trigger Point InjectionRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Hong, Chang-Zern·Current Pain and Headache Reports·2006

Comprehensive review establishing that successful myofascial pain treatment requires addressing underlying causes before trigger point therapy. Multiple treatment modalities are effective, but lasting relief depends on treating root pathology and patient education.

Trigger Point InjectionRead →
●●●●○ StrongCase Report/Series

The paravertebral fascial plane block: A novel, ultrasound-guided technique for paraspinal neck and back pain

Aulia et al.·American Journal of Emergency Medicine·2026

A novel ultrasound-guided fascial injection technique provided rapid, sustained pain relief for 11 emergency department patients with refractory paraspinal myofascial pain. Pain scores dropped from 9/10 to 1/10 at 48-hour follow-up with no complications.

Trigger Point InjectionRead →