Pilot StudyTreatment: Dry NeedlingClinical RelevanceDOI
6 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Chronic pain is a major burden for people living with social and health inequities, who often face barriers to accessing appropriate care and may resort to unregulated drug use to self-manage their suffering. Myofascial dysfunction (MFD), involving fascial tension, muscle trigger points, and scar tissue restrictions, is frequently overlooked as a contributor to chronic pain. The Downtown East Side (DTES) of Vancouver, British Columbia, is home to a particularly vulnerable population with high rates of trauma, homelessness, substance use disorders, and limited access to healthcare. Nonpharmacological interventions are urgently needed to reduce dependence on opioids and unregulated drugs. myoActivation® is a novel systematic assessment and needling process designed to address MFD by targeting scars, fascia, and muscles using fine-gauge cutting-tip needles.

While this approach has shown promise in pediatric populations, its effectiveness had not been studied in adults with complex social and health challenges.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a prospective, longitudinal, observational pilot study at the Vancouver Community Pain Service (VCPS) in the DTES. They enrolled 35 adults with chronic pain (lasting more than 3 months) who were scheduled for myoActivation treatment as part of routine clinical care. Participants were assessed at baseline (Week 1) and followed up at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the PEG score (Pain, Enjoyment of life, and General Activity), a validated 3-item measure where lower scores indicate better outcomes.

A 30% reduction in PEG was considered clinically meaningful. Secondary outcomes included the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and self-reported changes in substance and analgesic medication use. The myoActivation process involved a detailed trauma history (Timeline of Lifetime Trauma), posture assessment, movement tests (BASE tests), and palpation to identify areas of MFD, followed by needling of scars, fascia, and muscle trigger points. Treatment was individualized, with a median of 4 sessions per participant.

The study used linear mixed-effects models to analyze changes over time while accounting for missing data.

What They Found

At baseline, participants had a median PEG score of 7.7 out of 10, indicating severe pain and interference with life. PEG scores improved significantly at every follow-up point: the mean difference from baseline was −1.8 at Week 4 (95% CI −2.6 to −0.9, p<0.001), −2.1 at Week 12 (95% CI −3.1 to −1.1, p<0.001), and −2.5 at Week 24 (95% CI −3.5 to −1.5, p<0.001). This represents a 32% improvement over the study period, exceeding the threshold for clinical significance. Pain catastrophizing (PCS) also improved, with a mean reduction of −5.6 points at Week 24 (95% CI −10.2 to −1.1, p=0.016), a 16% improvement.

Pain self-efficacy (PSEQ) improved by a mean of 3.5 points at Week 24 (95% CI 0.8 to 6.2, p=0.013), a 36% improvement. At Week 24, 9 out of 27 participants (33%) reported less unregulated drug use, and 8 out of 27 (30%) reported less analgesic medication use. Among participants treated for scars (26 out of 35, or 74%), 92% experienced somatic reactions and 54% had emotional responses including recall of traumatic memories. No serious adverse events were reported.

Follow-up rates were 77% at Week 4, 54% at Week 12, and 57% at Week 24, with some additional data obtained from electronic medical records.

What This Means

This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that myoActivation, a structured dry needling approach targeting scars, fascia, and muscles, can produce clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in pain, function, and quality of life for people with chronic pain who face significant social and health inequities. The 32% reduction in PEG scores at 24 weeks is particularly notable given the complexity of this population, where 69% had substance use disorders, 49% had PTSD, and 51% were homeless or in precarious housing. The reductions in self-reported unregulated drug use and analgesic medication use, while based on small numbers, suggest potential broader public health benefits in the context of an ongoing toxic drug crisis. The emotional and somatic responses to scar needling highlight the importance of trauma-informed care and the interconnectedness of physical and psychological trauma stored in fascial tissues.

However, the lack of a control group, small sample size, and significant loss to follow-up limit causal inference. The findings support further research, ideally with randomized controlled designs and larger samples, to confirm these promising results and to explore whether myoActivation could be scaled as a point-of-care intervention in primary care settings for underserved populations.

25/100
Evidence StrengthLimited
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
32%
PEG Score Improvement at 24 Weeks
p<0.001
Statistical Significance for PEG Improvement
33%
Participants Reporting Less Unregulated Drug Use at 24 Weeks
30%
Participants Reporting Less Analgesic Medication Use at 24 Weeks

Key Findings

Clinically significant and sustained improvement in pain and functionHigh

PEG scores improved by a mean difference of −2.5 (95% CI −3.5 to −1.5, p<0.001) at Week 24, representing a 32% improvement that exceeds the threshold for clinical meaningfulness

Reduced pain catastrophizing over 24 weeksMedium

PCS scores improved by mean difference −5.6 (95% CI −10.2 to −1.1, p=0.016) at Week 24, a 16% improvement

Improved pain self-efficacyMedium

PSEQ scores improved by mean difference 3.5 (95% CI 0.8–6.2, p=0.013) at Week 24, a 36% improvement

Potential reduction in substance and medication useMedium

At 24 weeks, 9/27 (33%) reported less unregulated drug use and 8/27 (30%) reported less analgesic medication use, though these were self-reported outcomes with small numbers

High prevalence of trauma and emotional responses to scar needlingMedium

74% of participants had scars treated; 92% had somatic reactions and 54% had emotional responses including traumatic memory recall, with no serious adverse events

Study Methodology
Study Design
Prospective longitudinal observational pilot study without control group
Sample Size
35
Duration
24 weeks with assessments at baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks
Population
Adults with chronic pain >3 months living with social and health inequities in Vancouver's Downtown East Side, with high rates of trauma, homelessness, and substance use disorders
Outcome Measures
PEG (Pain, Enjoyment of Life, General Activity) · PCS (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) · PSEQ (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) · Self-reported substance and analgesic use · Electronic medical record data

Strengths

  • Use of validated outcome measures (PEG, PCS, PSEQ) with established clinical meaningfulness thresholds
  • Longitudinal follow-up over 24 weeks demonstrating sustained improvements
  • Study conducted in real-world clinical setting with highly underserved population rarely included in pain research
  • Linear mixed-effects analysis appropriately handled missing data and variable follow-up times

Limitations

  • No control group limits ability to attribute improvements solely to myoActivation
  • Small sample size (n=35) reduces generalizability and precision of estimates
  • Significant loss to follow-up (43% at Week 24, though partially mitigated by EMR data)
  • Single-center study in unique population may limit applicability to other settings
  • Self-reported substance and medication use data subject to recall and social desirability bias
  • Cannot isolate effects of myoActivation from other interdisciplinary services accessed by some participants

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01This study suggests that myoActivation needling may help reduce chronic pain and improve quality of life, even for people with very complex health and social challenges
  2. 02About one-third of participants reported using less unregulated drugs and less pain medication after treatment, though more research is needed to confirm this
  3. 03Treatment involving scar needling can trigger emotional memories or physical reactions like dizziness, so it should be done with trauma-informed care and support available
  4. 04The improvements were measured over 6 months, suggesting the benefits may last, but this was a small study without a comparison group, so larger studies are needed
  5. 05If you have chronic pain and a history of injuries, surgery, or trauma, asking your healthcare provider about myofascial dysfunction and whether needling approaches might help could be worthwhile

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Pain Research and Management

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Alhakami et al.·Medicina·2025

This systematic review of 8 randomized trials found that both deep and superficial dry needling provide similar short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with neck pain and myofascial trigger points. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two needling depths.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCross-Sectional Study

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists

Brady et al.·Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy·2014

First comprehensive safety study of trigger point dry needling found mild adverse events in 19% of treatments but no serious complications. Common side effects included bleeding, bruising, and temporary pain.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kalichman, Leonid & Vulfsons, Simon·Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine·2010

Clinical review confirming dry needling as an effective, low-risk treatment for myofascial pain affecting up to 10% of adults. Deep needling shows superior long-term results compared to superficial techniques.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of static, classical, and sham dry needling on muscle properties and autonomic nervous system activity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Olaniszyn et al.·Complementary Therapies in Medicine·2026

Classical dynamic dry needling with pistoning and local twitch response elicitation produced greater short-term improvements in pressure pain threshold, muscle stiffness, tone, and perfusion compared to static needling or sham in upper trapezius myofascial pain. Static needling was largely indistinguishable from sham on most outcomes.

Dry NeedlingRead →