Systematic ReviewTreatment: TENS & Electrical StimulationClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This review says that intramuscular electrical stimulation might help with myofascial pain syndrome, but more studies are needed.

Bottom line

Preliminary evidence suggests IMES could be a treatment option for myofascial pain syndrome.

Preliminary evidence

How well it works

5.0 / 10

The review suggests IMES might be effective, but larger trials are needed to confirm this.

Preliminary

Study participants

158not specifiednot specified

patients with myofascial pain syndrome

Words decoded

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS)
— A common cause of chronic muscle pain, often due to trigger points in the muscles.
Trigger point
— A specific spot in the muscle that is very tender and can cause pain in other areas of the body.
Intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES)
— A treatment that uses electricity to stimulate muscles, aiming to relieve pain and improve function.

Myth vs fact

Myth: Myofascial pain syndrome is rare.
Fact: Myth busted! It's actually one of the most common causes of chronic muscle pain.
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) affects almost one-third of people with musculoskeletal complaints, causing chronic pain from sensitive trigger points in muscles. While treatments like dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise help, researchers have been exploring intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) - a technique that combines needle insertion with electrical current delivered directly into the muscle. Despite some promising early studies, the evidence has been scattered and difficult to interpret, making it hard for clinicians to know when and how to use this treatment approach.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a comprehensive systematic review by searching seven major medical databases from 1990 to 2020 for randomized controlled trials that tested IMES in people with myofascial pain syndrome. They specifically looked for studies that compared IMES to sham treatment, dry needling alone, or exercise therapy. Two independent reviewers screened 397 potential studies, ultimately selecting 6 high-quality trials that met their strict criteria. They used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to evaluate study quality and extracted detailed information about treatment protocols, outcome measures, and results.

What They Found

The 6 included studies involved 158 total patients (76 receiving IMES, 82 in control groups). Most studies focused on neck and upper shoulder trigger points, with treatment sessions ranging from 1 to 10 visits. Electrical stimulation frequencies varied from 2 to 80 Hz, with most lasting 10-20 minutes per session. The studies measured various outcomes including pain levels, range of motion, pressure pain thresholds, and functional disability.

Generally, studies with better methodological quality showed significant improvements in pain and function with IMES compared to control treatments. However, the research was limited by small sample sizes, different treatment protocols, and varying follow-up periods that prevented combining results statistically.

What This Means

This review provides preliminary but encouraging evidence that IMES may be helpful for people with myofascial pain syndrome, particularly for reducing pain and improving function. The technique appears to work by delivering electrical current directly into trigger points, potentially improving blood flow and reducing muscle tension in ways that surface electrical stimulation cannot achieve. However, the current evidence comes from small studies with significant limitations. Patients and clinicians should view IMES as a potentially promising but still experimental treatment option.

The researchers emphasize that larger, better-designed trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols, determine which patients benefit most, and confirm long-term effectiveness before IMES can be recommended as a standard treatment approach.

55/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
6
Studies Included
158
Total Patients
397
Studies Screened

Key Findings

Six studies with 158 patients met inclusion criteriaHigh

Out of 397 initially identified studies, only 6 randomized controlled trials provided adequate evidence

Higher quality studies showed significant pain improvementHigh

Studies with low risk of bias demonstrated significant improvements in pain, disability, and analgesic use

Treatment protocols varied considerably across studiesMedium

Sessions ranged from 1-10, frequencies from 2-80 Hz, preventing meta-analysis

Most studies focused on neck and upper trapezius musclesMedium

Limited evidence for other body regions affected by trigger points

Small sample sizes limit generalizabilityHigh

Individual studies had 16-45 participants, affecting statistical power

One session may provide delayed benefitsMedium

Single-session treatment showed effectiveness after one week rather than immediately

Study Methodology
Study Design
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Sample Size
158
Duration
Studies from 1990-2020
Population
Patients with myofascial pain syndrome
Outcome Measures
VAS pain · Range of motion · Pressure pain threshold · Disability scores · Biomarkers

Strengths

  • Comprehensive search of multiple databases
  • Used rigorous Cochrane methodology for quality assessment
  • Clear inclusion criteria for study selection
  • Transparent reporting of limitations

Limitations

  • Only 6 small studies available for analysis
  • High heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis
  • Limited to cervical/upper trapezius regions
  • Inconsistent treatment protocols across studies

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01IMES may help reduce trigger point pain, but evidence is limited to small studies
  2. 02Treatment involves electrical stimulation delivered through needles into muscle knots
  3. 03Most research focused on neck and shoulder areas
  4. 04Larger studies are needed before this becomes a standard treatment option
  5. 05Current evidence suggests it may be more effective than sham treatment for some patients

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain-related Quantitative Sensory Tests in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Acute Experimental Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

DeJesus et al.·The Journal of Pain·2023

This systematic review of 58 studies found that TENS reduces both central and peripheral sensitization in chronic musculoskeletal pain. High-frequency TENS applied at sensory intensity for >30 minutes showed the strongest evidence for normalizing pain processing mechanisms.

TENS & Electrical StimulationRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Effects of Low-Frequency High-Intensity and High-Frequency Low-Intensity TENS on Neuromuscular Activation in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bae et al.·International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing·2025

Both low-frequency high-intensity and high-frequency low-intensity TENS significantly reduced pain and improved neck mobility in adults with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome. High-frequency low-intensity TENS uniquely improved the deltoid-to-upper trapezius muscle activation ratio, suggesting better normalization of shoulder movement patterns.

TENS & Electrical StimulationRead →
●●●●○ StrongMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) modality for treating myofascial pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Toopchizadeh et al.·J Res Clin Med·2024

This meta-analysis of 7 studies found that TENS significantly reduced pain intensity in myofascial pain syndrome patients compared to exercise, but had no effect on pain pressure threshold. The evidence supports TENS as an adjuvant therapy rather than standalone treatment for MPS.

TENS & Electrical StimulationRead →
●●●●○ StrongSystematic Review

Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) modality for treating myofascial pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Toopchizadeh et al.·J Res Clin Med·2024

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that TENS significantly reduced VAS pain scores compared to exercise for myofascial pain syndrome, but showed no significant benefit over sham treatment or for improving pain pressure threshold.

TENS & Electrical StimulationRead →