Patient-friendly summary
If you read nothing else
Bottom line
TENS might be worth discussing with your provider for myofascial pain syndrome.
Moderate evidenceAsk your provider
- What type of TENS treatment is best for my pain?
- How many TENS sessions will I need?
- What are the potential side effects of TENS?
Try this week
- Ask your provider about trying TENS for myofascial pain.
- Look into physical therapy options that include TENS.
How well it works
TENS showed significant pain reduction in the studies, but the evidence is from varied and sometimes low-quality trials.
VAS 0–10
Pain reduced from 7.4 to 4.3
Study Summary
Background
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic pain disorder affecting 30-93% of patients with musculoskeletal pain. It involves trigger points in muscles and fascia, primarily affecting the neck, shoulders, and back. Treatment options include medications, injections, and physical modalities like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS works by stimulating sensory nerves to block pain signals through the gate-control mechanism and by increasing endogenous opioid release.
While TENS is commonly used for various pain conditions, the evidence for its effectiveness in myofascial pain syndrome specifically needed systematic evaluation.
What They Did
The researchers conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis following established guidelines. They searched major medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central) from inception to July 2021 for randomized controlled trials comparing TENS to placebo, sham treatments, or exercise in MPS patients. Two reviewers independently screened 422 studies, ultimately selecting 21 articles for systematic review, with 12 trials suitable for detailed analysis and 7 studies providing data for meta-analysis. They assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and extracted data on pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) and pain pressure threshold measurements.
What They Found
The meta-analysis included 214 participants across 5 randomized trials. TENS showed significant pain reduction compared to exercise groups, with a mean difference of -1.60 points on the Visual Analog Scale (95% CI: -2.16 to -1.05, P < 0.001). However, TENS did not significantly improve pain pressure threshold scores compared to sham treatments (MD = 1.88, 95% CI: -0.62 to 4.38, P = 0.14) or exercise (MD = 0.19, 95% CI: -0.99 to 1.37, P = 0.75). The overall effect on pain pressure threshold was not statistically significant (MD = 0.96, 95% CI: -0.72 to 2.64, P = 0.26).
Study quality was generally moderate to good, though there was significant heterogeneity between studies due to variations in TENS parameters, treatment protocols, and patient populations.
What This Means
TENS appears to provide some benefit for reducing pain intensity in myofascial pain syndrome, particularly when compared to exercise alone. However, the evidence suggests TENS should be used as an adjuvant (add-on) treatment rather than a standalone therapy. The lack of improvement in pain pressure threshold indicates that while patients may feel less pain, the underlying trigger point sensitivity may not change significantly. Clinicians should consider TENS as part of a comprehensive treatment approach that may include other modalities like manual therapy, exercise, and medications.
The variability in treatment protocols across studies suggests that optimal TENS parameters for MPS still need to be established through larger, high-quality trials.
Results Comparison
VAS Pain Reduction
pointsKey Findings
| Finding | Detail | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| TENS significantly reduced pain intensity compared to exercise | Mean difference of -1.60 points on VAS scale (95% CI: -2.16 to -1.05, P < 0.001) | High |
| No improvement in pain pressure threshold with TENS | No significant difference vs sham (P = 0.14) or exercise (P = 0.75) | High |
| High heterogeneity between studies limits conclusions | I2 = 88% for VAS and 99% for PPT due to protocol variations | Medium |
| TENS works best as adjuvant therapy | Evidence supports combination with other treatments rather than monotherapy | Medium |
| Limited evidence from small studies | Only 7 studies suitable for meta-analysis with relatively small sample sizes | Medium |
Mean difference of -1.60 points on VAS scale (95% CI: -2.16 to -1.05, P < 0.001)
No significant difference vs sham (P = 0.14) or exercise (P = 0.75)
I2 = 88% for VAS and 99% for PPT due to protocol variations
Evidence supports combination with other treatments rather than monotherapy
Only 7 studies suitable for meta-analysis with relatively small sample sizes
Strengths
- Comprehensive systematic review following established guidelines
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only
- Quality assessment using Cochrane risk of bias tool
- Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria
Limitations
- Only 7 studies suitable for meta-analysis with small sample sizes
- High heterogeneity between studies due to protocol variations
- Limited long-term follow-up data
- Unclear optimal TENS parameters for MPS treatment
Key Takeaways for Patients
What This Means for You
- 01TENS electrical stimulation can help reduce your myofascial pain, but works best when combined with other treatments
- 02You may feel less pain with TENS, but the trigger points themselves may still be just as sensitive to touch
- 03TENS appears to be a safe addition to your treatment plan rather than a complete solution on its own
- 04More research is needed to determine the best TENS settings and treatment schedules for myofascial pain
- 05Talk to your healthcare provider about whether TENS might be helpful as part of your overall treatment approach