Randomized Controlled TrialTreatment: Dry NeedlingClinical RelevanceDOI
5 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial trigger points (TrPs) are hyperirritable spots in taut muscle bands that cause significant pain and disability, particularly in the upper trapezius (UT) muscle. These trigger points affect 30–85% of patients with musculoskeletal pain and can severely impact work, social activities, and quality of life. While trigger point compression technique (TCT) has been a standard manual therapy approach, dry needling (DN) has gained increasing interest among physical therapists. However, most previous studies on DN for UT trigger points examined only immediate effects or combined DN with other treatments.

No prior study had evaluated the clinical effectiveness of DN alone after one week of treatment specifically for UT muscle TrPs.

What They Did

This randomized controlled trial recruited 33 patients with active TrPs in the UT muscle from an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to either a standard group (n=17) receiving trigger point compression technique or an experimental group (n=16) receiving dry needling. Both groups received three treatment sessions over one week. The TCT involved applying gradually increasing pressure to the trigger point until pain decreased by approximately 50%, then increasing pressure again, repeated for about 90 seconds until tenderness and tension released.

The DN technique involved repeatedly needling the trigger point forward and backward until no more local twitch responses occurred. Outcomes were measured before treatment and one week after the third session: pain intensity using a 0–100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT) using a mechanical algometer, and disability using the 30-item Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

What They Found

Both groups showed significant improvements from before to after treatment in all three outcomes (P < 0.05). In the DN group, mean VAS pain scores dropped from 6.56 to 1.34 (on a 0–10 scale); in the TCT group, from 6.23 to 3.05. Mean PPT increased from 10.61 to 16.43 in the DN group and from 10.87 to 14.5 in the TCT group. Mean DASH scores improved from 24.7 to 12.81 in the DN group and from 26.44 to 16.93 in the TCT group.

When comparing between groups using ANCOVA with pre-treatment scores as covariates, the DN group showed significantly greater improvement in pain intensity (VAS) than the TCT group (P = 0.01, F = 6.3). However, there was no statistically significant between-group difference for PPT (P = 0.08, F = 3.17) or DASH disability scores (P = 0.34, F = 0.91), though the PPT difference of 2.19 kg/cm² between groups was noted as potentially clinically important.

What This Means

Dry needling appears to be more effective than trigger point compression technique for reducing pain intensity in patients with upper trapezius trigger points after one week of treatment. Both treatments provide meaningful improvements in pain, pressure pain threshold, and disability, but DN offers superior pain relief. This suggests DN may be particularly appropriate when pain reduction is the primary treatment goal. The lack of significant between-group differences for PPT and disability may reflect the small sample size, as the study was not powered to detect smaller effect sizes for these outcomes.

Clinicians can consider DN as a viable alternative or preferred option over manual compression for UT trigger points, especially for patients seeking faster or greater pain relief. Patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the upper trapezius may benefit from discussing DN with their physical therapist, particularly if they have not responded well to manual pressure techniques. Future research with larger samples and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings and determine whether the observed trends for PPT and disability would reach statistical significance with more participants.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
P = 0.01
VAS Pain Between-Group Significance
6.56 to 1.34
DN Group VAS Change
6.23 to 3.05
TCT Group VAS Change
0.92
PPT Measurement Reliability (ICC)
Enrolled

33

Randomized
n=16

Dry Needling

DN to trigger point until no more local twitch responses, 3 sessions

n=17

Trigger Point Compression

TCT with gradual pressure until 50% pain relief, repeated ~90s, 3 sessions

Results Comparison

VAS Pain Score (0-10)

0-10 scale
DN (pre)6.56 0-10 scale
DN (post)1.34 0-10 scale
TCT (pre)6.23 0-10 scale
TCT (post)3.05 0-10 scale

Key Findings

DN significantly outperformed TCT for pain intensity reductionHigh

ANCOVA revealed significant between-group difference on post-treatment VAS (F = 6.3, P = 0.01). DN group improved from 6.56 to 1.34 versus TCT 6.23 to 3.05.

Both treatments significantly improved all outcomes within groupsHigh

Paired t-tests showed significant pre-post improvements in VAS, PPT, and DASH for both DN and TCT groups (all P < 0.05).

No significant between-group difference for pressure pain thresholdMedium

PPT improved in both groups (DN: 10.61 to 16.43; TCT: 10.87 to 14.5) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.08, not statistically significant despite 2.19 kg/cm² between-group difference.

No significant between-group difference for disabilityMedium

DASH improved in both groups (DN: 24.7 to 12.81; TCT: 26.44 to 16.93) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.34, not statistically significant.

First study to assess DN effects after one week rather than immediatelyLow

Authors noted this was the first study of DN effects after one week of treatment for UT trigger points, rather than only immediate post-treatment effects.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Single-center randomized controlled trial with parallel groups
Sample Size
33
Duration
1 week (3 treatment sessions, outcomes measured 2 days after third session)
Population
Adults aged 20-48 with active TrP in upper trapezius muscle referred to outpatient physical therapy
Outcome Measures
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-100mm for pain intensity · Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) with mechanical algometer · Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire

Strengths

  • Randomized controlled design with allocation concealment by coin toss
  • Used validated outcome measures (VAS, PPT algometer, DASH)
  • Assessed outcomes after one week rather than only immediate effects
  • Reported intra-tester reliability for PPT measurement (ICC = 0.92)

Limitations

  • Small sample size (n=33) limits statistical power and generalizability
  • Single-center study from Iran may limit geographic generalizability
  • No long-term follow-up beyond one week
  • Treatment time not standardized between groups (TCT duration varied by patient response)
  • No blinding of patients or treating therapists

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Both dry needling and manual pressure therapy can help reduce pain from upper trapezius trigger points
  2. 02Dry needling may provide better pain relief than manual pressure based on this study
  3. 03Improvements were seen after just three sessions over one week
  4. 04The study did not find clear differences between treatments for improving function or pressure sensitivity
  5. 05Discuss with your physical therapist whether dry needling is appropriate for your specific situation

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Alhakami et al.·Medicina·2025

This systematic review of 8 randomized trials found that both deep and superficial dry needling provide similar short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with neck pain and myofascial trigger points. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two needling depths.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCross-Sectional Study

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists

Brady et al.·Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy·2014

First comprehensive safety study of trigger point dry needling found mild adverse events in 19% of treatments but no serious complications. Common side effects included bleeding, bruising, and temporary pain.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kalichman, Leonid & Vulfsons, Simon·Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine·2010

Clinical review confirming dry needling as an effective, low-risk treatment for myofascial pain affecting up to 10% of adults. Deep needling shows superior long-term results compared to superficial techniques.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of static, classical, and sham dry needling on muscle properties and autonomic nervous system activity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Olaniszyn et al.·Complementary Therapies in Medicine·2026

Classical dynamic dry needling with pistoning and local twitch response elicitation produced greater short-term improvements in pressure pain threshold, muscle stiffness, tone, and perfusion compared to static needling or sham in upper trapezius myofascial pain. Static needling was largely indistinguishable from sham on most outcomes.

Dry NeedlingRead →