Study Summary
Background
Myofascial trigger points (TrPs) are hyperirritable spots in taut muscle bands that cause significant pain and disability, particularly in the upper trapezius (UT) muscle. These trigger points affect 30–85% of patients with musculoskeletal pain and can severely impact work, social activities, and quality of life. While trigger point compression technique (TCT) has been a standard manual therapy approach, dry needling (DN) has gained increasing interest among physical therapists. However, most previous studies on DN for UT trigger points examined only immediate effects or combined DN with other treatments.
No prior study had evaluated the clinical effectiveness of DN alone after one week of treatment specifically for UT muscle TrPs.
What They Did
This randomized controlled trial recruited 33 patients with active TrPs in the UT muscle from an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to either a standard group (n=17) receiving trigger point compression technique or an experimental group (n=16) receiving dry needling. Both groups received three treatment sessions over one week. The TCT involved applying gradually increasing pressure to the trigger point until pain decreased by approximately 50%, then increasing pressure again, repeated for about 90 seconds until tenderness and tension released.
The DN technique involved repeatedly needling the trigger point forward and backward until no more local twitch responses occurred. Outcomes were measured before treatment and one week after the third session: pain intensity using a 0–100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT) using a mechanical algometer, and disability using the 30-item Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
What They Found
Both groups showed significant improvements from before to after treatment in all three outcomes (P < 0.05). In the DN group, mean VAS pain scores dropped from 6.56 to 1.34 (on a 0–10 scale); in the TCT group, from 6.23 to 3.05. Mean PPT increased from 10.61 to 16.43 in the DN group and from 10.87 to 14.5 in the TCT group. Mean DASH scores improved from 24.7 to 12.81 in the DN group and from 26.44 to 16.93 in the TCT group.
When comparing between groups using ANCOVA with pre-treatment scores as covariates, the DN group showed significantly greater improvement in pain intensity (VAS) than the TCT group (P = 0.01, F = 6.3). However, there was no statistically significant between-group difference for PPT (P = 0.08, F = 3.17) or DASH disability scores (P = 0.34, F = 0.91), though the PPT difference of 2.19 kg/cm² between groups was noted as potentially clinically important.
What This Means
Dry needling appears to be more effective than trigger point compression technique for reducing pain intensity in patients with upper trapezius trigger points after one week of treatment. Both treatments provide meaningful improvements in pain, pressure pain threshold, and disability, but DN offers superior pain relief. This suggests DN may be particularly appropriate when pain reduction is the primary treatment goal. The lack of significant between-group differences for PPT and disability may reflect the small sample size, as the study was not powered to detect smaller effect sizes for these outcomes.
Clinicians can consider DN as a viable alternative or preferred option over manual compression for UT trigger points, especially for patients seeking faster or greater pain relief. Patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the upper trapezius may benefit from discussing DN with their physical therapist, particularly if they have not responded well to manual pressure techniques. Future research with larger samples and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings and determine whether the observed trends for PPT and disability would reach statistical significance with more participants.
33
n=16
DN to trigger point until no more local twitch responses, 3 sessions
n=17
TCT with gradual pressure until 50% pain relief, repeated ~90s, 3 sessions
Dry Needling
DN to trigger point until no more local twitch responses, 3 sessions
Trigger Point Compression
TCT with gradual pressure until 50% pain relief, repeated ~90s, 3 sessions
Results Comparison
VAS Pain Score (0-10)
0-10 scaleKey Findings
| Finding | Detail | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| DN significantly outperformed TCT for pain intensity reduction | ANCOVA revealed significant between-group difference on post-treatment VAS (F = 6.3, P = 0.01). DN group improved from 6.56 to 1.34 versus TCT 6.23 to 3.05. | High |
| Both treatments significantly improved all outcomes within groups | Paired t-tests showed significant pre-post improvements in VAS, PPT, and DASH for both DN and TCT groups (all P < 0.05). | High |
| No significant between-group difference for pressure pain threshold | PPT improved in both groups (DN: 10.61 to 16.43; TCT: 10.87 to 14.5) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.08, not statistically significant despite 2.19 kg/cm² between-group difference. | Medium |
| No significant between-group difference for disability | DASH improved in both groups (DN: 24.7 to 12.81; TCT: 26.44 to 16.93) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.34, not statistically significant. | Medium |
| First study to assess DN effects after one week rather than immediately | Authors noted this was the first study of DN effects after one week of treatment for UT trigger points, rather than only immediate post-treatment effects. | Low |
ANCOVA revealed significant between-group difference on post-treatment VAS (F = 6.3, P = 0.01). DN group improved from 6.56 to 1.34 versus TCT 6.23 to 3.05.
Paired t-tests showed significant pre-post improvements in VAS, PPT, and DASH for both DN and TCT groups (all P < 0.05).
PPT improved in both groups (DN: 10.61 to 16.43; TCT: 10.87 to 14.5) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.08, not statistically significant despite 2.19 kg/cm² between-group difference.
DASH improved in both groups (DN: 24.7 to 12.81; TCT: 26.44 to 16.93) but ANCOVA showed P = 0.34, not statistically significant.
Authors noted this was the first study of DN effects after one week of treatment for UT trigger points, rather than only immediate post-treatment effects.
Strengths
- Randomized controlled design with allocation concealment by coin toss
- Used validated outcome measures (VAS, PPT algometer, DASH)
- Assessed outcomes after one week rather than only immediate effects
- Reported intra-tester reliability for PPT measurement (ICC = 0.92)
Limitations
- Small sample size (n=33) limits statistical power and generalizability
- Single-center study from Iran may limit geographic generalizability
- No long-term follow-up beyond one week
- Treatment time not standardized between groups (TCT duration varied by patient response)
- No blinding of patients or treating therapists
Key Takeaways for Patients
What This Means for You
- 01Both dry needling and manual pressure therapy can help reduce pain from upper trapezius trigger points
- 02Dry needling may provide better pain relief than manual pressure based on this study
- 03Improvements were seen after just three sessions over one week
- 04The study did not find clear differences between treatments for improving function or pressure sensitivity
- 05Discuss with your physical therapist whether dry needling is appropriate for your specific situation
Read the Full Paper
Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies
View Full Study