Cross-Sectional StudyComorbidities & Related ConditionsClinical RelevanceDOI
6 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common cause of anterior knee pain that primarily affects young women. While the exact cause remains unclear, researchers have increasingly recognized that problems in the lumbo-pelvic-hip region — the muscles of the lower back, pelvis, and hip — may contribute to this condition. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are hyperirritable spots in muscles that can cause local pain and refer pain to other areas. They can impair muscle function, reduce strength, and alter movement patterns.

Previous research suggested that impaired proximal stability from the lumbo-pelvic-hip region might lead to PFPS, but no studies had systematically examined how common trigger points are across these muscles in people with PFPS compared to healthy individuals. Knowing which specific muscles harbor trigger points could help therapists target treatment more effectively rather than treating every muscle in this large region.

What They Did

This study recruited 30 women with PFPS and 30 healthy women, all between 18 and 40 years old. The two groups were matched for age, height, and weight. A trained examiner who did not know which participants had PFPS assessed 14 muscles across three regions: lumbar muscles (internal oblique, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum), pelvic muscles (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, piriformis), and hip muscles (tensor fascia lata, sartorius, rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, semimembranosus, biceps femoris, and hip adductors). The examiner identified trigger points by palpation using established criteria: finding a taut band, tenderness, local twitch response, referred pain, or spontaneous pain patterns.

After finding trigger points, the researcher used a pressure algometer to measure the pressure pain threshold — the amount of pressure needed before the participant felt pain — recording this in kg/cm². Statistical tests compared prevalence rates between groups and pressure pain thresholds.

What They Found

The prevalence of trigger points was significantly higher in patients with PFPS for most muscles examined. In lumbar muscles, 80.0% of PFPS patients had trigger points in the internal oblique versus 33.0% of healthy women (p<0.001); 70.0% versus 26.7% in quadratus lumborum (p=0.001); and 76.7% versus 26.7% in erector spinae (p<0.001). In pelvic muscles, significant differences were found for gluteus maximus (60.0% vs 13.3%, p=0.006), gluteus medius (90.0% vs 56.7%, p=0.004), and piriformis (76.7% vs 43.3%, p=0.001), but not for gluteus minimus (93.3% vs 76.7%, p=0.071). In hip muscles, significant differences were found for tensor fascia lata (63.3% vs 23.3%, p=0.002), rectus femoris (76.7% vs 40.0%, p=0.004), sartorius (56.7% vs 30.0%, p=0.030), vastus medialis (66.7% vs 13.3%, p<0.001), vastus lateralis (76.7% vs 20.0%, p<0.001), semitendinosus and semimembranosus combined (90.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.002), and biceps femoris (86.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.002).

No significant difference was found for adductor muscles (96.7% vs 83.3%, p=0.085). Pressure pain thresholds were significantly lower in PFPS patients across all muscles tested, meaning they experienced pain with less pressure. For example, quadratus lumborum threshold was 1.39±0.86 kg/cm² in PFPS versus 2.92±1.46 in healthy participants (p<0.001); gluteus medius was 1.17±0.59 versus 2.61±1.20 (p<0.001); and vastus lateralis was 1.48±0.94 versus 3.36±1.41 (p<0.001).

What This Means

This study provides evidence that trigger points in the lumbo-pelvic-hip region are more common and more sensitive in women with PFPS compared to healthy individuals. The findings suggest that therapists treating PFPS should consider addressing trigger points in proximal muscles, not just focusing on the knee itself. The gluteus minimus and adductor muscles appear to be less useful as primary targets since trigger points were equally common in both groups. The extremely high prevalence of trigger points in adductor muscles in both groups (96.7% and 83.3%) suggests this may be a common finding in women generally rather than specific to PFPS.

For patients, this means that knee pain may be connected to problems in the back, pelvis, and hip muscles, and comprehensive treatment addressing these areas may be beneficial. However, the study only included women, so these findings may not apply to men, and the cross-sectional design cannot determine whether trigger points cause PFPS, result from it, or share a common cause.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
80.0%
Internal oblique trigger points in PFPS
96.7%
Adductor trigger points in PFPS (not significantly different from healthy)
p<0.001
Vastus lateralis prevalence difference
90.0%
Gluteus medius trigger points in PFPS
Enrolled

60

Randomized
n=30

PFPS

Women with patellofemoral pain syndrome

n=30

Healthy

Healthy women matched for age, height, weight

Results Comparison

Prevalence of MTrPs in quadratus lumborum

%
PFPS70 %
Healthy26.7 %

Prevalence of MTrPs in vastus lateralis

%
PFPS76.7 %
Healthy20 %

Pressure pain threshold in quadratus lumborum (kg/cm²)

kg/cm²
PFPS1.39 kg/cm²
Healthy2.92 kg/cm²

Key Findings

Trigger points were significantly more prevalent in PFPS patients for 12 of 14 lumbo-pelvic-hip musclesHigh

Significant differences were found in internal oblique (80.0% vs 33.0%, p<0.001), quadratus lumborum (70.0% vs 26.7%, p=0.001), erector spinae (76.7% vs 26.7%, p<0.001), gluteus maximus (60.0% vs 13.3%, p=0.006), gluteus medius (90.0% vs 56.7%, p=0.004), piriformis (76.7% vs 43.3%, p=0.001), tensor fascia lata (63.3% vs 23.3%, p=0.002), rectus femoris (76.7% vs 40.0%, p=0.004), sartorius (56.7% vs 30.0%, p=0.030), vastus medialis (66.7% vs 13.3%, p<0.001), vastus lateralis (76.7% vs 20.0%, p<0.001), semitendinosus/semimembranosus (90.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.002), and biceps femoris (86.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.002)

No significant difference in trigger point prevalence for gluteus minimus or adductor musclesHigh

Gluteus minimus: 93.3% vs 76.7% (p=0.071); Adductor: 96.7% vs 83.3% (p=0.085). The very high prevalence in both groups for adductors suggests this may be common in women generally

Pressure pain thresholds were significantly lower in PFPS patients across all 14 musclesHigh

All p-values were ≤0.003, with the largest differences in quadratus lumborum (1.39±0.86 vs 2.92±1.46 kg/cm², p<0.001), erector spinae (1.31±0.88 vs 3.19±1.46, p<0.001), and gluteus medius (1.17±0.59 vs 2.61±1.20, p<0.001)

All PFPS patients had trigger points in quadriceps muscle belliesMedium

Vastus lateralis was the most prevalent quadriceps site (76.7%), though Smith (2012) found vastus medialis most prevalent in a predominantly male sample

Study Methodology
Study Design
Retrospective cross-sectional case-control study
Sample Size
60
Duration
Single assessment session
Population
Women aged 18-40 with PFPS (n=30) and healthy matched controls (n=30)
Outcome Measures
Manual palpation for MTrP prevalence · Pressure algometry (FDIX25 Digital Force Gauge) for pressure pain threshold · Patellar grind test · Functional Index Questionnaire · Visual Analog Scale

Strengths

  • Blinded examiner unaware of group assignment reduced detection bias
  • Comprehensive assessment of 14 muscles across three anatomical regions
  • Matched controls for age, height, and weight
  • Used established Travell and Simons criteria for trigger point identification

Limitations

  • Cross-sectional design cannot establish causality — trigger points may cause, result from, or coexist with PFPS
  • Small sample size (30 per group) limits generalizability
  • Only women studied, results may not apply to men
  • No assessment of psychological or emotional factors that could influence trigger point sensitivity
  • Retrospective design with potential selection bias

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Your knee pain may be connected to tight, tender spots in your back, hip, and thigh muscles — not just your knee
  2. 02Physical therapy that addresses muscles in your lower back, pelvis, and hips may help your knee pain
  3. 03The muscles on the side of your hip (gluteus medius) and your hamstrings are especially likely to need attention
  4. 04Inner thigh muscle tenderness is very common in women generally, so it may be less specific to your knee problem
  5. 05More research is needed to know whether treating these muscle spots actually improves knee pain over time

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Treatments for enhancing sleep quality in fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anna Pathak et al.·Rheumatology (Oxford)·2025

A meta-analysis of randomized trials in fibromyalgia found that CBT for insomnia moderately improved sleep quality, while most common drugs showed little to no benefit and pregabalin and sodium oxybate helped modestly but carried risks.

Comorbidities & Related ConditionsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Relationship Between Sleep Disturbances and Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review

Sejal V. Jain et al.·Clinics and Practice (Clin Pract)·2024

A narrative review concluding that sleep disturbances and chronic pain share a bidirectional relationship, with current evidence suggesting that poor sleep predicts pain more strongly than pain predicts poor sleep.

Comorbidities & Related ConditionsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Katie Whale et al.·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders·2022

In 42 randomised trials of people with chronic pain, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia improved sleep quality post-treatment, though long-term and pain benefits were limited.

Comorbidities & Related ConditionsRead →
●●●●○ StrongMeta-analysis

Effects of Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Interventions for the Management of Sleep Problems in People With Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Jemma Hudson et al.·Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken)·2025

A network meta-analysis of RCTs found that some forms of exercise training may improve sleep quality in people with fibromyalgia, but overall certainty of evidence is low.

Comorbidities & Related ConditionsRead →