Meta-analysisComorbidities & Related ConditionsTreatment: Exercise & MovementSystematic Reviews & Meta-analysesClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

For people with fibromyalgia and poor sleep, some forms of exercise — especially land-based aerobic with stretching and water-based aerobic exercise — may improve sleep quality, while medications showed no clear sleep benefit, though the overall evidence is weak.

Bottom line

Some forms of exercise training appear more likely than other treatments to improve sleep quality in fibromyalgia, but the evidence is too uncertain to confirm any single best intervention; pharmacologic treatments did not show a clear sleep benefit.

Preliminary evidence

Published

2025
1 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis ◀ this study
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Study participants

8,247 participants in the sleep-quality network meta-analysis (from 90 sleep-quality studies; 168 studies identified overall)Average age ranging from 35.1 to 57.7 years across studies94% women

Adults with fibromyalgia, predominantly middle-aged women from high-income countries

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

This systematic review and network meta-analysis synthesized 168 randomized controlled trials (90 of which assessed sleep quality in adults with fibromyalgia) to evaluate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for fibromyalgia-related sleep problems. In the sleep-quality network (65 studies, 8,247 participants, 35 treatment categories), some forms of exercise — particularly land-based aerobic combined with flexibility training and aquatic aerobic training — showed evidence of improving sleep quality versus placebo or sham, though the authors rated overall certainty as generally low. No clear beneficial effect on sleep quality was found for pharmacologic interventions, and most studies were at high risk of bias with small samples and short follow-up. The authors conclude that some exercise training may improve sleep but that current evidence does not support firm conclusions about optimal treatment.

62/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication

Key Findings

Land-based aerobic plus flexibility exercise and aquatic aerobic exercise may improve sleep qualityHigh

Versus placebo or sham, land-based aerobic combined with flexibility training showed SMD -4.69 (95% CrI -8.14 to -1.28) and aquatic-based aerobic exercise showed SMD -2.63 (95% CrI -4.74 to -0.58) for sleep quality; certainty was rated generally low.

No clear beneficial effect of pharmacologic interventions on sleep qualityHigh

The authors note they did not observe a significant beneficial effect of pharmacologic interventions on sleep quality; tricyclics (SMD -1.26, CrI -4.47 to 1.93) and antipsychotics (SMD -1.28, CrI -3.56 to 0.97) showed only modest, uncertain effects with wide credible intervals.

Several interventions showed only modest, uncertain effects on sleepMedium

Land-based strengthening exercise, sleep-focused psychological/behavioral therapy, weight loss, electrotherapy, dental splints, tricyclics, and antipsychotics suggested a modest effect on sleep, but findings could not be confirmed with certainty due to wide credible intervals.

Quality of life (FIQ) improved with several exercise, psychological, and some drug interventionsMedium

Versus placebo or sham, improvements in FIQ were seen for land-based aerobic plus flexibility exercise (MD -19.91), multidisciplinary training (MD -17.31), land-based mind-body exercise (MD -16.18), psychological/behavioral therapy variants, and pharmacologic treatments including antioxidants, iron replacement, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and CNS depressants, though effect magnitude varied.

Evidence quality was low with high risk of biasHigh

Of 90 studies, 82 (91.1%) were judged high risk of bias in at least one domain; only one study (1.1%) was low risk. Studies were mostly small (under 100 participants) with short follow-up (around 3 months), and CINeMA certainty for sleep-quality comparisons was low to very low.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy results were unreliableLow

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy showed a positive effect on sleep quality (SMD -4.51, 95% CrI -7.44 to -1.56) and FIQ, but the authors question reliability because the estimate came from indirect evidence based on only nine participants in the intervention group.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, with risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool and certainty assessed using CINeMA.
Sample Size
168 studies identified for inclusion; sleep-quality network meta-analysis included 65 studies with 8,247 participants across 35 treatment categories (90 studies assessed sleep quality overall).
Duration
Most contributing studies had short-term follow-up of around 3 months; databases were searched in November 2021.
Population
Across the 90 sleep-quality studies, all participants were adults, 94% were women, with average age ranging from 35.1 to 57.7 years; among 30 studies reporting ethnicity, most participants were described as White or Caucasian, mostly from high-income countries.
Outcome Measures
Sleep quality via validated patient-reported outcome measures (primary; PSQI, MOS-SS, JSS, VAS, SQ-NRS, FMSD, NRS) · Quality of life via Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) · SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) · SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) · Sleep duration · Adverse events

Strengths

  • Most comprehensive synthesis to date of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for fibromyalgia-related sleep problems, drawing on 168 identified RCTs.
  • Large pooled sample for the sleep-quality network meta-analysis (8,247 participants across 35 treatment categories).
  • Used network meta-analysis to compare many interventions, including indirect comparisons, alongside formal risk-of-bias (Cochrane RoB) and certainty (CINeMA) assessment.
  • Transparent reporting of uncertainty, with the authors explicitly mirroring the low certainty and questioning unreliable estimates (e.g., hyperbaric oxygen).

Limitations

  • Most included studies were at high overall risk of bias (82 of 90 studies high in at least one domain), with certainty of evidence rated low to very low for sleep-quality comparisons.
  • Contributing studies were mostly small (under 100 participants) with short follow-up (around 3 months) and lacked head-to-head comparisons of active treatments.
  • Sleep quality was measured inconsistently across studies using several different patient-reported outcome measures, and there was no information on minimally important clinical differences, contributing to heterogeneity and inconsistency.
  • 97 active interventions were grouped into 45 categories, so individual treatments varied within categories; planned component network meta-analysis was not possible due to lack of data.
  • Participants were predominantly middle-aged women from high-income countries, limiting generalizability; patient-level modifiers and mood disorders such as depression could not be explored.

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01If you have fibromyalgia and poor sleep, some forms of exercise — especially land-based aerobic exercise with stretching, and aquatic (water-based) aerobic exercise — showed the most promise for improving sleep quality in this review.
  2. 02Medications did not show a clear benefit for sleep quality in this analysis, though some had modest, uncertain effects and may help other aspects of quality of life.
  3. 03The evidence is weak overall: most studies were small, short, and at high risk of bias, so no single treatment can be confidently recommended as best.
  4. 04Exercise and other nonpharmacologic treatments were generally well tolerated, with mostly mild side effects like stiffness and fatigue, while medications more often caused dizziness, drowsiness, headache, and dry mouth.
  5. 05Treatment decisions should be made with your clinician, weighing your individual symptoms and preferences, since the research does not point to one optimal therapy.

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken)

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Treatments for enhancing sleep quality in fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anna Pathak et al.·Rheumatology (Oxford)·2025

A meta-analysis of randomized trials in fibromyalgia found that CBT for insomnia moderately improved sleep quality, while most common drugs showed little to no benefit and pregabalin and sodium oxybate helped modestly but carried risks.

Comorbidities & Related ConditionsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Comparative effectiveness of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for myofascial pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Liu et al.·International Journal of Surgery·2024

Network meta-analysis of 40 RCTs found manual therapy, laser therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy most effective for reducing pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome. These three treatments showed benefits across pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and functional outcomes comp

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →