Narrative ReviewTreatment: Dry NeedlingClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This review paper discusses the common issue of post-needling soreness after dry needling treatment for myofascial trigger points and suggests areas for future research.

Bottom line

Post-needling soreness is a frequent outcome after dry needling that should be considered when evaluating treatment effectiveness.

Moderate evidence

Ask your provider

  • What are the potential benefits and risks of dry needling for my condition?
  • How can post-needling soreness be managed?
  • What can I expect during and after the dry needling procedure?

Call your doctor if

  • Severe pain that lasts more than a few days after treatment

General warning signs for this condition, not side effects of the studied treatment. If any apply to you, contact a clinician promptly.

Try this week

  • Ask your provider about the possible side effects of dry needling, including post-needling soreness.

Possible side effects

  • post-needling soreness(50-100%)
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Post-needling soreness is a common complication after dry needling of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), but its clinical significance and management remain poorly understood. Myofascial trigger points are hypersensitive nodules in muscle taut bands that contribute to pain conditions including tension headaches, neck pain, and shoulder impingement. Dry needling has emerged as an evidence-based treatment, but the soreness that follows treatment may affect patient compliance and treatment outcomes.

What They Did

The authors conducted a comprehensive narrative review examining the current literature on post-needling soreness characteristics, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and research implications. They analyzed data from multiple studies investigating soreness frequency, intensity, duration, and associated factors after trigger point dry needling. The review synthesized findings from studies using different needle types, techniques, and patient populations.

What They Found

Post-needling soreness occurs in 50-100% of patients receiving dry needling, typically lasting less than 72 hours when using solid filament needles. The soreness is caused by neuromuscular damage, hemorrhage, and inflammatory reactions from needle insertion. Mean maximum intensity ranges from 3.5-5.6 on a 0-10 scale. Studies using beveled needles showed longer-lasting soreness (mean 5 days) compared to solid filament needles.

The number of needle insertions and pain during needling positively correlate with soreness intensity. Patients with central sensitization conditions like fibromyalgia experience more severe and prolonged soreness. Most patients find the soreness tolerable compared to their original trigger point pain, though some may discontinue treatment due to distress.

What This Means

For clinicians, post-needling soreness should be expected and discussed with patients before treatment. While usually mild and temporary, it can influence treatment adherence, particularly in patients with low baseline pain or those not experiencing immediate treatment benefits. Researchers studying dry needling effectiveness must account for post-needling soreness as it may mask original pain and influence outcome measurements, especially in short-term assessments. Future research should focus on establishing the clinical relevance of soreness, developing prevention strategies, and determining optimal patient education approaches.

55/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
50-100%
Patients Experience Soreness
72h
Typical Duration
3.5-5.6
Mean Max Pain Intensity

Key Findings

Post-needling soreness occurs in 50-100% of patients receiving dry needlingHigh

Frequency varies by study design, needle type, and patient population, with most studies reporting high incidence rates

Soreness typically resolves within 72 hours with solid filament needlesHigh

Duration is longer (mean 5 days) when using beveled hypodermic needles compared to solid filament needles

Soreness intensity correlates with number of needle insertions and procedural painMedium

More tissue damage from multiple insertions and eliciting local twitch responses increases soreness severity

Most patients find soreness tolerable compared to original trigger point painMedium

However, patients with low baseline pain or no immediate benefit may find soreness more distressing and abandon treatment

Soreness may mask original pain and influence research outcomesHigh

Post-needling soreness can interfere with accurate pain ratings and functional assessments in dry needling studies

Various treatments may reduce post-needling sorenessMedium

Interventions like PENS, low-load exercise, ultrasound, spray and stretch, and ischemic compression show promise for soreness management

Study Methodology
Study Design
Narrative review of existing literature
Sample Size
Multiple studies analyzed
Duration
Literature through 2017
Population
Patients receiving dry needling for myofascial trigger points
Outcome Measures
Post-needling soreness frequency · Pain intensity scales · Duration of symptoms · Associated factors

Strengths

  • Comprehensive review of available literature on important clinical topic
  • Addresses both clinical and research implications of post-needling soreness
  • Provides practical recommendations for clinicians and researchers
  • Synthesizes data from multiple studies with different methodologies

Limitations

  • Narrative rather than systematic review methodology
  • Limited high-quality studies available on the topic
  • Significant heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures
  • Lack of standardized protocols for assessing post-needling soreness

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Expect mild soreness for 1-3 days after dry needling - this is normal and usually means the treatment is working
  2. 02The soreness feels different from your original trigger point pain and will gradually improve
  3. 03Let your therapist know if the soreness is severe or lasts longer than expected
  4. 04Continue gentle, normal movement during the soreness period as recommended by your therapist
  5. 05Don't let fear of temporary soreness prevent you from trying this effective treatment

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Alhakami et al.·Medicina·2025

This systematic review of 8 randomized trials found that both deep and superficial dry needling provide similar short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with neck pain and myofascial trigger points. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two needling depths.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCross-Sectional Study

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists

Brady et al.·Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy·2014

First comprehensive safety study of trigger point dry needling found mild adverse events in 19% of treatments but no serious complications. Common side effects included bleeding, bruising, and temporary pain.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kalichman, Leonid & Vulfsons, Simon·Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine·2010

Clinical review confirming dry needling as an effective, low-risk treatment for myofascial pain affecting up to 10% of adults. Deep needling shows superior long-term results compared to superficial techniques.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of static, classical, and sham dry needling on muscle properties and autonomic nervous system activity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Olaniszyn et al.·Complementary Therapies in Medicine·2026

Classical dynamic dry needling with pistoning and local twitch response elicitation produced greater short-term improvements in pressure pain threshold, muscle stiffness, tone, and perfusion compared to static needling or sham in upper trapezius myofascial pain. Static needling was largely indistinguishable from sham on most outcomes.

Dry NeedlingRead →