Randomized Controlled TrialTreatment: Dry NeedlingClinical RelevanceDOI
5 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFP) is a common knee problem in female athletes characterized by pain around or behind the kneecap. While exercise therapy is the standard treatment, many patients continue to have pain and functional limitations. Recent research suggests that dysfunction in core muscles, particularly trigger points (tight, painful spots) in the gluteus medius and quadratus lumborum muscles, may contribute to patellofemoral pain. These muscles play crucial roles in hip and trunk stability, which affects knee mechanics.

This study investigated whether adding dry needling treatment for these trigger points could enhance the benefits of standard exercise therapy.

What They Did

Researchers recruited 40 female athletes (ages 18-45) with unilateral patellofemoral pain lasting at least 3 months. Participants were randomly divided into two groups of 20 each. The control group received exercise therapy alone for 4 weeks, including quadriceps strengthening, hip exercises, and core stability training. The treatment group received the same exercise program plus weekly dry needling sessions targeting trigger points in the gluteus medius muscle on the affected side and the quadratus lumborum muscle on the opposite side.

An experienced physiotherapist performed the dry needling using thin needles inserted into the trigger points to elicit muscle twitches and deactivate the painful spots. All participants attended 2 supervised clinic sessions per week and performed home exercises 3 times weekly. Outcomes were measured before treatment, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at 6 weeks follow-up.

What They Found

Both groups showed significant improvements in pain, function, and muscle sensitivity, but the dry needling group had substantially greater improvements in all measures. For pain on a 0-10 scale, the exercise-only group improved from 6.0 to 3.5 points, while the dry needling group improved from 5.9 to 1.4 points. Functional improvements were measured using the Kujala questionnaire (0-100 scale), where the exercise group improved from 72.8 to 80.8 points, while the dry needling group improved from 73.9 to 92.1 points. The step-down test showed the exercise group improved from 10.8 to 14.2 repetitions, while the dry needling group improved from 13.1 to 21.3 repetitions.

Balance testing using the modified star excursion balance test showed improvements in all directions for both groups, but significantly greater improvements in the dry needling group. Pressure pain thresholds (measuring muscle sensitivity) increased in both groups, indicating reduced muscle tension and pain sensitivity, but the improvements were much larger in the dry needling group. All improvements in the dry needling group exceeded the minimal clinically important differences for these measures.

What This Means

This study provides strong evidence that adding dry needling treatment for gluteus medius and quadratus lumborum trigger points significantly enhances the benefits of exercise therapy for female athletes with patellofemoral pain. The combination treatment resulted in greater pain reduction, improved function, better balance, and reduced muscle sensitivity compared to exercise alone. These findings support the theory that addressing dysfunctional core muscles can improve knee pain and function, likely by optimizing hip and trunk stability, which in turn reduces abnormal stress on the patellofemoral joint. For clinicians, this suggests that a comprehensive approach targeting both local knee muscles and proximal hip/core muscles may be more effective than focusing solely on quadriceps strengthening.

The dry needling technique appears to help normalize muscle function and reduce trigger point-related dysfunction. For patients with patellofemoral pain, this research indicates that addressing trigger points in core muscles may provide additional benefits beyond standard physical therapy exercises, potentially leading to faster and more complete recovery.

65/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
76%
Pain Reduction (DN Group)
92
Final Kujala Score (DN Group)
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
Enrolled

40

Randomized
n=20

Exercise + Dry Needling

Exercise therapy + weekly dry needling

n=20

Exercise Only

Exercise therapy alone

Results Comparison

Final Pain Score (0-10)

points
Exercise + DN1.4 points
Exercise Only3.5 points

Final Kujala Function Score (0-100)

points
Exercise + DN92 points
Exercise Only81 points

Key Findings

Combined therapy showed superior pain reductionHigh

Exercise plus dry needling reduced pain by 76% vs 42% with exercise alone

Functional improvements were clinically meaningfulHigh

Kujala score improved 18.2 points (DN group) vs 8.0 points (exercise only)

Balance and stability significantly improvedHigh

All three directions of star excursion test showed greater improvements with combined therapy

Muscle sensitivity substantially reducedHigh

Pressure pain thresholds increased by 81% (gluteus medius) and 82% (quadratus lumborum) in DN group

Effects sustained at 6-week follow-upMedium

Benefits continued to improve between 4-6 weeks in the dry needling group

Study Methodology
Study Design
Single-blind randomized controlled trial
Sample Size
40
Duration
4 weeks treatment, 6 weeks total follow-up
Population
Female athletes aged 18-45 with unilateral patellofemoral pain
Outcome Measures
Numerical pain rating scale · Kujala patellofemoral scale · Step-down test · Modified star excursion balance test · Pressure pain threshold

Strengths

  • Well-designed randomized controlled trial with proper blinding
  • Used validated, reliable outcome measures
  • Clinically relevant effect sizes across multiple domains
  • Clear inclusion/exclusion criteria with homogeneous population

Limitations

  • Limited to female athletes aged 18-45, reducing generalizability
  • No sham needling control group to account for placebo effects
  • Short follow-up period of only 6 weeks
  • Unsupervised home exercise program with no adherence monitoring

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01If you have patellofemoral pain, tight muscles in your hip and back might be contributing to your knee symptoms
  2. 02Combining dry needling for trigger points with exercise therapy may provide better pain relief than exercises alone
  3. 03Treatment targeting core muscles can improve not just pain but also balance and overall function
  4. 04The benefits of combined treatment appear to continue improving even after formal treatment ends
  5. 05This approach may be particularly beneficial for female athletes with chronic patellofemoral pain

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Alhakami et al.·Medicina·2025

This systematic review of 8 randomized trials found that both deep and superficial dry needling provide similar short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with neck pain and myofascial trigger points. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two needling depths.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkCross-Sectional Study

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists

Brady et al.·Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy·2014

First comprehensive safety study of trigger point dry needling found mild adverse events in 19% of treatments but no serious complications. Common side effects included bleeding, bruising, and temporary pain.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kalichman, Leonid & Vulfsons, Simon·Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine·2010

Clinical review confirming dry needling as an effective, low-risk treatment for myofascial pain affecting up to 10% of adults. Deep needling shows superior long-term results compared to superficial techniques.

Dry NeedlingRead →
●●●●○ StrongRandomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of static, classical, and sham dry needling on muscle properties and autonomic nervous system activity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Olaniszyn et al.·Complementary Therapies in Medicine·2026

Classical dynamic dry needling with pistoning and local twitch response elicitation produced greater short-term improvements in pressure pain threshold, muscle stiffness, tone, and perfusion compared to static needling or sham in upper trapezius myofascial pain. Static needling was largely indistinguishable from sham on most outcomes.

Dry NeedlingRead →