Systematic ReviewPain Science & Central SensitizationTreatment: Exercise & MovementSystematic Reviews & Meta-analysesClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

For long-term knee and hip pain, learning about your pain seems to help most when it goes hand-in-hand with exercise — on its own it doesn't appear to work as well as exercise.

Bottom line

Patient education appears to add benefit for chronic lower limb pain when paired with exercise, but works less reliably as a stand-alone treatment, and the evidence is too varied to define a best-practice program.

Moderate evidence

Published

2026
0 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review ◀ this study
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Study participants

47 RCTs (52 records); individual sample sizes ranged 24 to 523, median 113Mostly older adults with mean ages often above 60; one study examined young adults (mean age 28)Higher proportion of female participants across studies

Adults with chronic lower limb musculoskeletal pain, mainly knee and hip osteoarthritis

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

This scoping review mapped randomized controlled trials on Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) — an umbrella that includes pain neuroscience education and self-management instruction — for adults with chronic lower limb musculoskeletal pain. The authors included 47 RCTs (52 records) and found research is heavily concentrated on hip and knee osteoarthritis, with no trials at all in chronic ankle or foot conditions and almost none in young adults. TPE interventions varied enormously in their teaching topics, providers, delivery methods, and dosage. Across studies, TPE combined with exercise appeared more effective than exercise alone, minimal information, or usual care for pain and function, whereas TPE delivered as a stand-alone treatment showed inconsistent effects and generally appeared less effective than exercise.

68/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication

Key Findings

Patient education combined with exercise outperformed exercise alone, information, or usual careHigh

When combined with exercise, TPE was associated with greater pain reduction and function improvement compared to exercise alone, information/little education, usual care, heat therapy, and no intervention, though some trials found no statistically significant differences. The authors describe these as apparent associations across heterogeneous studies, not a pooled effect.

Education on its own appeared less effective than exerciseHigh

Delivered as a stand-alone intervention, TPE generally demonstrated lower effectiveness than exercise for pain and tended to be inferior or similar for function and disability. Effects of TPE alone were described as inconsistent and uncertain.

Research is concentrated on hip and knee osteoarthritis with major gapsHigh

Of the included studies, 33 addressed knee osteoarthritis, 8 hip and knee osteoarthritis, and 3 hip osteoarthritis alone; only 8 studies focused on conditions other than osteoarthritis (chronic knee pain, patellofemoral pain, gluteal tendinopathy). No RCT investigated chronic foot or ankle conditions such as chronic ankle instability or Achilles tendinopathy, and only one study examined a young adult population.

TPE interventions were highly heterogeneousMedium

Educational topics (specific pathology, self-management, physical activity, load management, pain science, diet, stress, sleep), providers, delivery modes (face-to-face in 44 studies, phone/Internet in 4, app/web in 4), number of sessions (1 to 24), and total time (30 minutes to 12 hours) varied widely, preventing quantitative synthesis. Stress management and sleep education were each covered in only a few studies.

Benefits may relate more to coping and function than pain intensityMedium

The authors suggest greater effects when TPE is combined with exercise may reflect improvements in pain interference, disability, coping, and participation in daily activities rather than pain intensity alone, consistent with prior low back pain reviews.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Scoping review of randomized controlled trials, reported per PRISMA-ScR and registered on the Open Science Framework
Sample Size
47 RCTs corresponding to 52 records; individual study sample sizes ranged from 24 to 523 participants (median 113)
Duration
Databases searched up to 1 April 2024; included studies published between 1997 and 2023 (median 2017)
Population
Adults (age 18 and over) with chronic lower limb musculoskeletal pain, predominantly older adults (mean age often over 60) with a higher proportion of women; conditions were mainly knee and hip osteoarthritis
Outcome Measures
Pain intensity (reported in 45 studies) · Function (26 studies) · Quality of life (13 studies) · Disability (8 studies) · Risk of bias via revised Joanna Briggs Institute checklist

Strengths

  • Comprehensive multi-database search (PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane) restricted to RCTs
  • Followed PRISMA-ScR reporting standards with a registered protocol on the Open Science Framework
  • Independent dual screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts with third-reviewer arbitration
  • Risk of bias appraised for every included study using the revised Joanna Briggs Institute checklist
  • Clearly characterized intervention details (topics, providers, delivery, dosage) using the TIDieR checklist

Limitations

  • As a scoping review it maps the literature and does not formally assess clinical effectiveness or pool results, so cause-and-effect conclusions cannot be drawn
  • Substantial heterogeneity in TPE content, dosage, providers, and comparators precluded quantitative synthesis and identification of best practices
  • Only RCTs were included; gray literature and protocol databases were not searched, deviating from the registered protocol
  • Studies in languages other than English, Italian, French, or Spanish were excluded (four studies excluded for language)
  • Many included trials had moderate or high risk of bias, and blinding of participants and providers was often absent
  • Evidence is concentrated in older adults with osteoarthritis, limiting generalizability to younger people and to ankle/foot conditions

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Education about your pain works best alongside an exercise program — on its own it tends to help less than exercise for chronic knee and hip pain.
  2. 02There is no single proven 'dose' of education; programs in the studies ranged from a single session to 24 sessions and from 30 minutes to 12 hours total.
  3. 03Education may help most by improving how you cope with and function despite pain, not just by lowering pain intensity.
  4. 04Most evidence comes from older adults with knee or hip osteoarthritis; there is little research for ankle/foot problems or younger people, so findings may not apply to everyone.
  5. 05Topics like stress management and sleep, which can influence chronic pain, were rarely addressed in the studies and may be worth discussing with your clinician.

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Healthcare (Basel)

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianjun Liu et al.·Frontiers in Psychology·2026

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs found that CBT-based interventions produce small-to-moderate reductions in pain intensity and the largest, most consistent reductions in pain catastrophizing for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Reducing Pain, Disability, Kinesiophobia, and Catastrophizing in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luisa Medina-Viedma et al.·Medical Sciences (Basel)·2025

A meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (810 patients) found that pain neuroscience education, usually added to exercise or physiotherapy, may reduce pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing in chronic low back pain, though the authors urge caution given small trials and heterogeneity.

Central SensitizationRead →