Meta-analysisPain Science & Central SensitizationSystematic Reviews & Meta-analysesComorbidities & Related ConditionsClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

A review of six small trials suggests acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) may improve quality of life and pain acceptance in people with fibromyalgia, with no reported harms - but the evidence is still limited.

Bottom line

ACT shows promise for improving quality of life, pain acceptance and related symptoms in fibromyalgia and appears well tolerated, but the small, varied evidence base means larger trials are needed to confirm how big the benefit really is.

Preliminary evidence

Published

2023
3 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis ◀ this study
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Study participants

384 participants across 6 RCTs (176 intervention, 208 control)Median mean age ~48.75 yearsMostly female (median ~97.4% women)

Adults with fibromyalgia (ACR criteria or self-report) in Europe and North America

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled six randomised controlled trials (384 mostly-female participants) to evaluate acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for fibromyalgia. ACT, delivered online, in groups or one-to-one, was superior to control conditions for improving health-related quality of life (FIQ) and pain acceptance (CPAQ) both immediately after treatment and at follow-up, and showed moderate-to-large improvements across secondary outcomes including pain, disability, depression, anxiety and fatigue. Attrition stayed below 20% in four of six studies and no adverse events were attributed to ACT. The authors emphasise that the evidence base is small, methodologically varied and at risk of overestimating effect sizes, so larger trials are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

58/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication

Key Findings

ACT improved fibromyalgia-related quality of life (FIQ) versus controlsHigh

Pooled effect favoured ACT at post-intervention (SMD -1.05, 95% CI -2.02 to -0.09) and at follow-up (SMD -1.43, 95% CI -2.17 to -0.69), with negative scores indicating reduced disease impact. FIQ was reported by only four of six studies.

ACT increased pain acceptance (CPAQ) versus controlsHigh

Pooled effect favoured ACT post-intervention (SMD 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.49) and at follow-up (SMD 0.95, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.49). CPAQ/CPAQ-R was reported by only four of six studies.

Secondary outcomes showed moderate-to-large improvements post-interventionMedium

Large pooled effects for depression and anxiety and moderate effects for pain and disability post-intervention, all with confidence intervals excluding zero. Fatigue (reported by a single study) improved with a large effect (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.22).

Some benefits were less certain at follow-upMedium

For pain intensity at follow-up the pooled SMD was -0.48 but the 95% CI crossed zero, so the effect was not statistically meaningful; for disability at follow-up the upper CI was near zero (-0.01).

Acceptability and safety appeared favourableMedium

Attrition was between 5 and 10% in five studies; one study exceeded 20% overall (27.3%), driven by control-group dropout (40.0%) rather than the ACT arm (16.7%). No adverse events were reported as attributable to ACT.

In one trial ACT outperformed recommended pharmacological treatmentMedium

Group ACT versus recommended pharmacological treatment (pregabalin +/- duloxetine) favoured ACT for FIQ (SMD -1.80, 95% CI -2.26 to -1.34 post-treatment) and CPAQ (SMD 1.35, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.78 post-treatment); this is a single-study finding.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, conducted per PRISMA; random-effects models in RevMan with effect sizes as Hedge's g (SMD); risk of bias per Cochrane Handbook; protocol specified in advance but not registered.
Sample Size
6 RCTs; 384 participants total (176 intervention, 208 control)
Duration
Searches run 12/02/2018 and updated 26/08/2023; included trials varied in length; follow-up data counted only if measured at least 3 months post-treatment (follow-up periods of 3, 6 and 12 weeks/months reported across studies).
Population
Adults with fibromyalgia (clinically diagnosed via ACR criteria or self-reported); median mean age 48.75 years; median 97.4% women; trials conducted in North America (USA, Canada) and Europe (Spain, UK, Sweden).
Outcome Measures
Pain acceptance (CPAQ/CPAQ-R) · Health-related quality of life (FIQ/FIQR) · Attrition rate · Frequency of adverse events · Pain intensity (PVAS, 0-10 numerical rating, short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire) · Disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index) · Depression (HADS, PHQ-9, CES-D, BDI/BDI-II) · Anxiety (HADS, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) · Fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory)

Strengths

  • Followed PRISMA guidance and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane Handbook; all six included studies were rated high quality (0-2 unclear/high risks of bias).
  • Included trials had high treatment quality on the Yates rating scale (five scored 8/9, one 7/9).
  • Authors of included studies were contacted to obtain unpublished or fibromyalgia-specific data, reducing reporting gaps.
  • Funnel plots for the two primary outcomes did not indicate a high risk of publication bias.
  • Spanned multiple delivery modes (online, group, one-to-one) and several countries, supporting generalisability to European and North American clinical practice.

Limitations

  • Only six RCTs were available, with differing methodologies, sample sizes and outcome measures.
  • Three studies had fewer than 50 fibromyalgia participants and three were statistically underpowered, so effect sizes may be overestimated (upward bias) despite Hedge's g correction.
  • The two primary outcomes (FIQ and CPAQ) were each reported by only four of the six studies.
  • Heterogeneity was high for several outcomes (I-squared ranged 0-92%) and could not be explored via subgroup analysis or meta-regression due to too few studies.
  • At follow-up, the pooled effect for pain intensity was not statistically meaningful (95% CI crossed zero), and disability effects were close to zero.
  • Results may not be applicable outside Europe and North America; one study had a notable conflict of interest (authors affiliated with the app developer that funded it).
  • The protocol was specified in advance but not registered.

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a talking therapy that aims to build psychological flexibility - learning to accept difficult thoughts and feelings while staying focused on what matters to you - rather than trying to eliminate pain.
  2. 02Across six small trials, ACT was linked to better quality of life and greater pain acceptance in people with fibromyalgia, with improvements often holding up at follow-up.
  3. 03ACT was also associated with improvements in pain, disability, depression, anxiety and fatigue, though the certainty for pain at longer follow-up was weaker.
  4. 04ACT can be delivered in different ways - online, in a group, or one-to-one - which may help people who face cost or travel barriers to in-person therapy.
  5. 05No harms were reported from ACT, but because the studies were few and small, the true size of the benefit is uncertain and larger studies are needed.

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from British Journal of Pain

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianjun Liu et al.·Frontiers in Psychology·2026

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs found that CBT-based interventions produce small-to-moderate reductions in pain intensity and the largest, most consistent reductions in pain catastrophizing for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Reducing Pain, Disability, Kinesiophobia, and Catastrophizing in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luisa Medina-Viedma et al.·Medical Sciences (Basel)·2025

A meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (810 patients) found that pain neuroscience education, usually added to exercise or physiotherapy, may reduce pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing in chronic low back pain, though the authors urge caution given small trials and heterogeneity.

Central SensitizationRead →