Systematic ReviewEtiology & MechanismsSystematic Reviews & Meta-analysesDiagnosis & AssessmentClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

Researchers reviewed the available studies and found mixed evidence on whether working from home causes muscle and joint pain, with back and neck pain reported most often and a comfortable, ergonomic workspace seeming to help.

Bottom line

Evidence on whether teleworking causes musculoskeletal disorders is conflicting, though a possible rise in nonspecific pain (especially low back and neck) linked to poor ergonomics and work organization appears to emerge; the underlying studies are mostly low-quality and self-reported.

Preliminary evidence

Published

2023
3 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review ◀ this study
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report
Expert Opinion

Study participants

25 studies; within-study participant counts ranged from 40 to 12,774Not reportedNot reported

Workers and students exposed to teleworking or working from home, mostly office workers under mandatory COVID-19 lockdown teleworking

Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

This qualitative systematic review (PRISMA-guided) examined whether teleworking affects musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), drawing on 25 studies selected from 205 identified records. The findings were conflicting: some studies reported increased prevalence or intensity of musculoskeletal pain (most often low back and neck pain) during work-from-home periods, while others found no association. The authors note that an increase in nonspecific MSD linked to organizational and ergonomic factors appears to emerge, but the overall risk of bias was high — only 5 of 25 studies had low or probably low risk of bias, and most used cross-sectional designs. They conclude that longitudinal studies accounting for ergonomic, work-organization, and socioeconomic factors are needed.

55/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication

Key Findings

Evidence on teleworking and MSD is conflictingHigh

Across the 25 included studies, some found increased prevalence or pain intensity during work-from-home periods or when comparing groups with different telework frequency, while others found no association between MSD and telework.

Low back pain and neck pain were the most reported MSDHigh

Most articles inquired about pain from various body regions; the most reported musculoskeletal disorders were low back and neck pain, with some studies focusing specifically on neck pain or lower back pain.

Ergonomic and psychosocial factors appear to modify the effectHigh

Certain ergonomic and psychosocial factors were associated with increased intensity or frequency of musculoskeletal pain; having an appropriate location to work from home with sufficient space and less demanding workloads decreased the effect of WFH on MSD. A study of workers with prior low back pain found increased pain during lockdown telework that was not significant among those with a dedicated workstation.

Overall risk of bias was highHigh

Only 5 of the 25 studies had low or probably low risk of bias for the review-specific criteria (population representativeness and presence of a control group). Only 8 studies considered confounders in analyses, 6 extensively; only 7 had a control group.

All MSD outcomes were subjective, with no medical diagnosesMedium

Outcomes were self-reported pain intensity, frequency, or change before/after lockdown; there were no medical diagnoses of conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome or sciatica. Validated questionnaires (most often the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire) were used in nearly half the studies.

Almost all evidence comes from the COVID-19 pandemic contextMedium

All 25 studies were published during or after 2020, and only one used pre-pandemic data; the pandemic itself is a potential strong confounder, and most studies involved mandatory teleworking due to lockdowns.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Qualitative systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (no meta-analysis; risk of bias assessed using the Navigation Guide for environmental and occupational health)
Sample Size
25 studies included (from 205 identified); participant counts within studies ranged from 40 to 12,774
Duration
Databases searched for papers published since 1987; extraction completed 5 May 2022
Population
Workers (including students) exposed to teleworking or working at home; most studies involved office workers under mandatory lockdown-related teleworking
Outcome Measures
Self-reported MSD via validated questionnaires (most often the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire) · Numerical and Likert-type scales for pain intensity and/or frequency · Reported change in pain before vs. after lockdown/work-from-home · Risk of bias across nine domains (Navigation Guide), including population representativeness and presence of a control group

Strengths

  • Exhaustive search protocol across multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cairn, EBSCO, Google Scholar) with a librarian, plus cross-reference checking
  • PRISMA-guided two-step selection with at least two independent reviewers and third-reviewer consensus for disagreements
  • Formal risk-of-bias assessment using the Navigation Guide, with an added criterion specific to the review's aim (population representativeness and control group)
  • Good geographic representation of included studies (Asia, Europe, America, Australia)

Limitations

  • No quantitative pooling or grading of evidence was possible due to heterogeneous methods and bias among included studies
  • High overall risk of bias — only 5 of 25 studies had low/probably low risk; most were cross-sectional, raising risk of reverse causation and differential reporting
  • All MSD outcomes were subjective (self-reported pain), with no medical diagnoses
  • Nearly all evidence is from the COVID-19 pandemic context, a potential strong confounder, with only one pre-pandemic dataset
  • Only studies in English or French were included, and the lack of a 'Teleworking' MeSH term before 2021 may have missed earlier studies

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Working from home does not automatically cause musculoskeletal pain — the research is mixed, and much depends on your setup and circumstances.
  2. 02Low back and neck pain are the complaints most often reported by people who work from home.
  3. 03A proper, dedicated workspace with enough room, a reasonable workload, and good ergonomics appears to reduce the impact of home working on pain.
  4. 04Long stretches of sitting with fewer breaks and less movement may add to the risk, so building in regular movement during the workday is sensible.
  5. 05Because most of this evidence is lower-quality and based on self-reported pain during the pandemic, conclusions should be viewed with caution.

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Comparative effectiveness of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for myofascial pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Liu et al.·International Journal of Surgery·2024

Network meta-analysis of 40 RCTs found manual therapy, laser therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy most effective for reducing pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome. These three treatments showed benefits across pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and functional outcomes comp

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain—An Umbrella Review

Chys et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2023

This umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews found strong evidence that dry needling provides superior short-term pain reduction compared to sham treatments across all body regions. DN is equally effective to other treatments and may provide additional benefit when combined with conventional physio

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →