Case-Control StudyEtiology & MechanismsClinical RelevanceDOI
5 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common and costly chronic pain disorder affecting 30 to 85% of the population, yet its exact pathophysiologic mechanism remains poorly understood. Patients with MPS experience not only persistent muscle pain but also depression, anxiety, and reduced quality of life. While biochemical changes have been studied in various pain conditions, the specific roles of inflammation and oxidative stress in MPS—and how they relate to clinical symptoms like pain intensity and quality of life—have not been well established. Understanding these biological mechanisms could lead to better diagnostic approaches and targeted treatments for this prevalent condition.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a case-control study comparing 43 patients with primary myofascial pain syndrome to 42 healthy controls matched for age and body mass index. All participants were recruited from rehabilitation outpatient clinics at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Iran between October 2018 and May 2019. MPS patients had neck or shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months, active myofascial trigger points in specific shoulder muscles (trapezius, infraspinatus, and/or levator scapulae), pain scores above 4 on a 0-10 visual analog scale, and normal neurological examinations. The researchers measured five blood biomarkers: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) as inflammatory markers; and malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) as oxidative stress markers.

They also assessed pain intensity at rest, during activity, and at night using visual analog scales; measured pressure pain threshold with an electronic algometer; and evaluated quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire. Statistical analyses compared biomarker levels between groups and examined correlations with clinical outcomes.

What They Found

MPS patients showed significantly higher levels of inflammatory and oxidative stress markers compared to healthy controls. Specifically, serum hs-CRP was 4.68 ± 4.36 vs. 2.92 ± 4.55 μg/ml (p = 0.011), PLA2 was 6.81 ± 2.22 vs. 4.73 ± 2.97 pg/ml (p < 0.001), and MDA was 2.63 ± 0.71 vs. 1.98 ± 0.90 nmol/ml (p < 0.001). Conversely, antioxidant levels were lower in MPS patients: TAC was 2.46 ± 0.49 vs. 2.83 ± 0.82 mmol/L (p = 0.011) and SOD was 78.89 ± 37.93 vs. 154.25 ± 115.93 U/ml (p < 0.001). Quality of life was substantially worse in MPS patients across most SF-36 domains, with particularly large differences in physical health (202.97 ± 85.09 vs. 278.30 ± 88.36, p = 0.001) and mental health (213.44 ± 79.18 vs. 264.61 ± 65.87, p = 0.001).

Importantly, hs-CRP levels were positively associated with resting pain (r = 0.349, p = 0.019), activity pain (r = 0.295, p = 0.049), night pain (r = 0.304, p = 0.043), and pain duration (r = 0.283, p = 0.007). TAC was negatively associated with resting pain intensity (r = -0.312, p = 0.037). Quality of life measures correlated positively with TAC and negatively with hs-CRP and PLA2 levels.

What This Means

This study provides compelling evidence that systemic inflammation and oxidative stress are not just present in myofascial pain syndrome but are directly linked to how much pain patients experience and how poor their quality of life becomes. The findings suggest that MPS involves whole-body biological changes, not just localized muscle problems. For patients, this means that future treatments targeting inflammation or boosting antioxidant defenses might help reduce pain and improve daily functioning beyond conventional muscle-focused therapies. For clinicians, measuring these biomarkers could potentially help assess disease severity or monitor treatment response.

However, because this was a case-control study, it cannot prove that inflammation causes MPS—only that the two are associated. The small sample size and single-center design mean these findings need confirmation in larger, longitudinal studies before biomarker-guided treatments become standard practice.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
4.68 ± 4.36
hs-CRP in MPS patients (μg/ml)
2.92 ± 4.55
hs-CRP in healthy controls (μg/ml)
p < 0.001
Significance for PLA2, MDA, and SOD differences
78.89 ± 37.93
SOD in MPS patients (U/ml)
Enrolled

85

Randomized
n=43

MPS Patients

Case group with primary myofascial pain syndrome

n=42

Healthy Controls

Age- and BMI-matched healthy subjects

Results Comparison

hs-CRP (μg/ml)

μg/ml
MPS Patients4.68 μg/ml
Healthy Controls2.92 μg/ml

SOD (U/ml)

U/ml
MPS Patients78.89 U/ml
Healthy Controls154.25 U/ml

MDA (nmol/ml)

nmol/ml
MPS Patients2.63 nmol/ml
Healthy Controls1.98 nmol/ml

Key Findings

Elevated inflammatory markers in MPSHigh

Serum hs-CRP (4.68 ± 4.36 vs. 2.92 ± 4.55 μg/ml, p = 0.011) and PLA2 (6.81 ± 2.22 vs. 4.73 ± 2.97 pg/ml, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in MPS patients compared to healthy controls.

Increased oxidative stress with reduced antioxidant capacityHigh

MDA was higher (2.63 ± 0.71 vs. 1.98 ± 0.90 nmol/ml, p < 0.001) while TAC (2.46 ± 0.49 vs. 2.83 ± 0.82 mmol/L, p = 0.011) and SOD (78.89 ± 37.93 vs. 154.25 ± 115.93 U/ml, p < 0.001) were lower in MPS patients.

hs-CRP correlates with multiple pain measuresHigh

Serum hs-CRP was positively associated with resting pain (r = 0.349, p = 0.019), activity pain (r = 0.295, p = 0.049), night pain (r = 0.304, p = 0.043), pressure pain threshold (r = 0.210, p = 0.047), and pain duration (r = 0.283, p = 0.007).

Antioxidant levels linked to pain and quality of lifeMedium

TAC was negatively associated with resting pain intensity (r = -0.312, p = 0.037), and quality of life scales correlated positively with TAC and negatively with hs-CRP and PLA2.

Quality of life substantially impaired in MPSHigh

All SF-36 scales and subscales were significantly lower in MPS patients except physical function, energy/fatigue, and emotional wellbeing. Physical health: 202.97 ± 85.09 vs. 278.30 ± 88.36 (p = 0.001); Mental health: 213.44 ± 79.18 vs. 264.61 ± 65.87 (p = 0.001).

Study Methodology
Study Design
Case-control study
Sample Size
85
Duration
Single cross-sectional assessment
Population
Adults aged 18-60 with primary MPS of neck/shoulder and age- and BMI-matched healthy controls
Outcome Measures
Serum hs-CRP · PLA2 · MDA · TAC · SOD · Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain · Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) · SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire

Strengths

  • Matched case-control design with age and BMI matching
  • Multiple validated biomarkers assessed simultaneously
  • Comprehensive clinical assessment including pain at rest, activity, and night
  • Use of validated outcome measures (VAS, PPT, SF-36)

Limitations

  • Relatively small sample size (85 total participants)
  • Case-control design cannot establish causality
  • Single-center study from Iran limits generalizability
  • No serial biomarker measurements to assess dynamic changes
  • No dietary assessment of anti-inflammatory micronutrients

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Your blood may show signs of increased inflammation and oxidative stress if you have myofascial pain syndrome
  2. 02Higher inflammation levels appear linked to more severe pain and worse daily functioning
  3. 03Antioxidant levels in your body may be lower than in people without this condition
  4. 04Future treatments might target these biological processes, not just the painful muscles
  5. 05More research is needed to confirm whether reducing inflammation directly improves symptoms

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from BMC Research Notes

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective

Shah et al.·PM R·2015

This narrative review traces the evolution of myofascial trigger point understanding from 19th-century clinical observations through modern biochemical, imaging, and neurophysiological research, revealing emerging objective evidence for a condition long diagnosed by palpation alone.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

A Brief Overview and Update of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Myofascial Trigger Points

Gerber et al.·Journal of The Spinal Research Foundation·2011

This comprehensive review examines the pathophysiology of myofascial trigger points, revealing elevated inflammatory markers and altered tissue properties. The research provides objective evidence supporting trigger point diagnosis using ultrasound imaging and validates treatment mechanisms.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkLaboratory Study

Hyaluronan within fascia in the etiology of myofascial pain

Stecco et al.·Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy·2011

Study reveals hyaluronan as a key lubricant in fascial layers and proposes that alterations in this sliding mechanism may be the underlying cause of myofascial pain. Discovery of specialized "fasciacyte" cells suggests new targets for treatment.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial trigger points: spontaneous electrical activity and its consequences for pain induction and propagation

Ge et al.·Chinese Medicine·2011

This review reveals that spontaneous electrical activity at myofascial trigger points represents sustained muscle contractions that create local ischemia and pain sensitization. Active trigger points can transition localized pain to generalized pain conditions through central nervous system sensitization.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →