Cross-Sectional StudyEtiology & MechanismsClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This study looked for links between substances in the blood and myofascial pain, finding some preliminary connections that need more research.

Bottom line

Preliminary evidence suggests a link between certain substances in the blood and myofascial pain, worth discussing with your provider.

Preliminary evidence

Study participants

n=3820–6125 women

people with myofascial pain in the upper trapezius muscle

Not everyone agrees

This study explores the connection between blood markers and myofascial pain, a topic that has lacked consensus on diagnostic criteria.

Body regions

upper trapezius

Published

2023
3 years ago
Current
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) affects about 15% of people seeking medical attention in the US, but diagnosing it remains challenging because clinicians disagree on the criteria. While doctors typically look for trigger points (tender spots in muscles) and other physical signs, these findings can be unreliable and subjective. The lack of precise diagnostic tools makes it difficult to select effective treatments and understand what causes MPS. This study aimed to discover whether specific substances in the blood (called microanalytes) might correlate with the physical findings commonly seen in MPS patients, potentially providing a more objective way to diagnose and understand the condition.

What They Did

Researchers recruited 38 people (25 women, average age 32) who had experienced myofascial pain in their upper trapezius (shoulder/neck area) for at least three months. All participants underwent comprehensive physical examinations by experienced clinicians who checked for trigger points, measured range of motion in the shoulders and neck, tested muscle strength, and assessed joint flexibility using the Beighton Index. They also measured pain sensitivity using a pressure device and collected self-reported pain scores. Most importantly, each participant provided a fasting blood sample that was analyzed for 21 different substances, including inflammatory markers (cytokines), growth factors, and brain chemicals (neurotransmitters).

The researchers then used statistical analysis to look for correlations between these blood markers and the clinical findings.

What They Found

The study revealed several significant correlations between blood markers and clinical measurements. People with more joint flexibility (higher Beighton scores) had higher levels of certain inflammatory markers, particularly IL-5 and IL-7, along with growth factors GM-CSF and DHEA. Those with asymmetrical movement patterns - where one side of the body moved differently than the other - showed associations with various cytokines. The researchers found that several inflammatory markers clustered together, suggesting they work as a group.

Additionally, brain-derived factors like BDNF correlated with other neurochemicals including NPY and acetylcholine. About 21% of participants had widespread pain, and 35% showed hypermobility. The most common trigger point locations were in the upper trapezius region, with active trigger points showing lower pain thresholds than latent ones.

What This Means

This research provides the first evidence that specific blood markers might be linked to the physical findings commonly seen in people with myofascial pain syndrome. While this is preliminary research with a small group, it suggests that MPS involves measurable biochemical changes that could potentially be used for diagnosis in the future. The correlation between joint flexibility and certain inflammatory markers is particularly interesting because it suggests a biological basis for why some people with connective tissue differences might be more prone to developing MPS. For patients, this research represents a step toward more precise diagnosis and potentially personalized treatments.

For clinicians, it offers hope for objective biomarkers that could complement physical examination findings, leading to more consistent diagnosis and better treatment selection. However, more research with larger groups is needed to confirm these findings and determine if blood tests could become a practical diagnostic tool.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
21
Biomarkers Measured
21%
Had Widespread Pain
35%
Showed Hypermobility
p<0.05
Correlation Significance

Key Findings

Joint hypermobility correlated with specific inflammatory markersHigh

Beighton Index scores significantly correlated with IL-5, IL-7, GM-CSF, and DHEA levels

Movement asymmetries associated with cytokine levelsMedium

Shoulder and cervical range of motion asymmetries correlated with various inflammatory markers

Cytokines clustered together suggesting coordinated responseMedium

Strong correlations found between IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-8 and GM-CSF

Brain factors correlated with neurotransmittersMedium

BDNF showed significant correlations with NPY and acetylcholine

Active trigger points had lower pain thresholdsHigh

Active trigger points: 6.9 lbs/sq inch vs latent: 9.3 lbs/sq inch vs no trigger points: 11.8 lbs/sq inch

Study Methodology
Study Design
Cross-sectional observational study
Sample Size
38
Duration
Single assessment timepoint
Population
Adults with chronic myofascial pain in upper trapezius >3 months
Outcome Measures
Beighton Index · Range of motion · Muscle strength · Pressure pain threshold · 21 serum biomarkers · Pain scores

Strengths

  • Comprehensive assessment of 21 different biomarkers
  • Standardized clinical evaluations by experienced clinicians
  • Novel approach linking biochemical and physical findings
  • Used validated outcome measures for pain and function

Limitations

  • Small sample size limits generalizability
  • No control group without pain for comparison
  • Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation
  • Single-center study with potential selection bias

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Blood tests might someday help doctors diagnose myofascial pain more accurately
  2. 02People with more flexible joints may have different inflammatory patterns that could relate to their pain
  3. 03The study found measurable biological differences in people with MPS, supporting that it's a real medical condition
  4. 04More research is needed before blood tests become available for routine diagnosis
  5. 05This research helps validate that myofascial pain involves real biochemical changes in the body

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective

Shah et al.·PM R·2015

This narrative review traces the evolution of myofascial trigger point understanding from 19th-century clinical observations through modern biochemical, imaging, and neurophysiological research, revealing emerging objective evidence for a condition long diagnosed by palpation alone.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

A Brief Overview and Update of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Myofascial Trigger Points

Gerber et al.·Journal of The Spinal Research Foundation·2011

This comprehensive review examines the pathophysiology of myofascial trigger points, revealing elevated inflammatory markers and altered tissue properties. The research provides objective evidence supporting trigger point diagnosis using ultrasound imaging and validates treatment mechanisms.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkLaboratory Study

Hyaluronan within fascia in the etiology of myofascial pain

Stecco et al.·Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy·2011

Study reveals hyaluronan as a key lubricant in fascial layers and proposes that alterations in this sliding mechanism may be the underlying cause of myofascial pain. Discovery of specialized "fasciacyte" cells suggests new targets for treatment.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

Myofascial trigger points: spontaneous electrical activity and its consequences for pain induction and propagation

Ge et al.·Chinese Medicine·2011

This review reveals that spontaneous electrical activity at myofascial trigger points represents sustained muscle contractions that create local ischemia and pain sensitization. Active trigger points can transition localized pain to generalized pain conditions through central nervous system sensitization.

Etiology & MechanismsRead →