Systematic ReviewTreatment: Exercise & MovementClinical RelevanceDOI
5 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a widespread chronic pain problem, with estimates suggesting it affects about 85% of patients in pain clinics and 9% of those in general internal medicine settings. The condition is marked by myofascial trigger points—tight, irritable bands in skeletal muscle that cause localized and referred pain. While stretching and strengthening exercises are commonly used treatments, less is known about whether aerobic exercise specifically helps people with myofascial pain. Aerobic exercise might help by increasing blood flow and oxygen to trigger points, reducing inflammation, and raising pain thresholds through effects on the central nervous system.

Given that aerobic exercise is accessible, noninvasive, and low-cost, understanding its role in myofascial pain management could expand treatment options for patients.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a systematic review to find and evaluate studies testing aerobic exercise for myofascial pain. They searched four major medical databases—MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science—from each database's start through November 2016. They looked for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials that compared aerobic exercise (minimum 4 weeks) to no exercise or non-exercise treatments in adults with confirmed myofascial trigger points. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, pain pressure thresholds, number of trigger points, medication use, function, and range of motion.

Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. They planned to pool results statistically if multiple studies were found, using mean differences and standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

What They Found

Of 1,331 articles initially identified after removing duplicates, only 23 warranted full-text review. Just one study met all inclusion criteria—a randomized controlled trial by Cantarero-Villanueva et al. (2012) involving 66 breast cancer survivors with myofascial trigger points and neck/shoulder-axillary pain. Participants were randomized to either an 8-week water exercise program (three times weekly, one-hour sessions in a warm pool) or a control group.

The exercise sessions included 10 minutes of warm-up, 35 minutes of low-intensity endurance and core training, and 15 minutes of cool-down with stretching and relaxation.

The study found that participants in the water exercise group had significantly lower pain intensity scores on the visual analogue scale for both neck pain and shoulder/axillary pain compared to controls after the intervention. For neck pain, the mean difference was -30 (95% CI: -25 to -35). For shoulder/axillary pain, the mean difference was -31 (95% CI: -25 to -37). Pain pressure thresholds increased significantly in the cervical spine area of the water exercise group, with a mean difference of 20.3 (95% CI: 34.1 to 6.5) at the C5-6 zygapophyseal joint on the affected side.

The number of active trigger points decreased significantly in most affected muscles in the exercise group compared to controls, including the upper trapezius (18 to 5 versus 18 to 19), infraspinatus (10 to 3 versus 16 to 16), scalene (24 to 6 versus 18 to 17), and pectoralis major (25 to 10 versus 21 to 27). The study had low risk of bias according to the Downs and Black checklist, though there was some uncertainty about blinding of investigators to group assignment.

What This Means

The evidence base for aerobic exercise in myofascial pain is extremely limited—only one suitable study was found despite a comprehensive search. However, that single study provides promising initial evidence that water-based aerobic exercise may reduce pain intensity, increase pain pressure thresholds in the cervical spine, and decrease the number of active trigger points in breast cancer survivors with myofascial pain. Clinicians might consider recommending aerobic exercise, particularly water-based programs, as part of a multimodal approach to myofascial pain management. The combination of aerobic exercise with strengthening and stretching exercises could be especially beneficial, as these interventions may work through complementary mechanisms—aerobic exercise potentially reducing generalized pain and trigger point formation, while strengthening exercises support affected muscles and improve pain tolerance.

Patients with myofascial pain who are looking for non-pharmacological, low-impact options may find water exercise particularly appealing. However, much more research is needed, including studies in broader populations beyond breast cancer survivors, direct comparisons of aerobic versus strengthening exercise, and investigation of optimal exercise dosing and delivery formats.

35/100
Evidence StrengthLimited
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
1,331
Articles initially identified
1
Study eligible for inclusion
66
Participants in included RCT
-30
Mean difference in neck pain VAS (exercise vs control)

Results Comparison

Neck Pain VAS Score Change

mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -35)
Water Exercise-30 mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -35)
Control0 mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -35)

Shoulder/Axillary Pain VAS Score Change

mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -37)
Water Exercise-31 mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -37)
Control0 mean difference (95% CI: -25 to -37)

Key Findings

Only one RCT met inclusion criteria for aerobic exercise in myofascial painHigh

Of 1,331 articles screened, only the Cantarero-Villanueva et al. (2012) study qualified, highlighting a major gap in the literature.

Water exercise significantly reduced neck and shoulder-axillary painHigh

Mean difference in VAS scores was -30 (95% CI: -25 to -35) for neck pain and -31 (95% CI: -25 to -37) for shoulder/axillary pain.

Pain pressure thresholds increased in cervical spine after water exerciseMedium

Affected C5-6 zygapophyseal joint showed mean difference of 20.3 (95% CI: 34.1 to 6.5); no significant changes at other body sites.

Active trigger points decreased in most affected musclesHigh

Significant reductions occurred in upper trapezius, infraspinatus, scalene, and pectoralis major muscles in the exercise group versus controls.

Study had low risk of biasMedium

Downs and Black assessment showed low risk except for some uncertainty about investigator blinding to group assignment.

Study Methodology
Study Design
Systematic review with comprehensive database search (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science)
Sample Size
N/A (review; one included RCT had 66 participants)
Duration
Search from database inception to November 2016; included RCT was 8 weeks
Population
Adults with myofascial trigger points confirmed by expert diagnosis; included RCT studied breast cancer survivors post-mastectomy
Outcome Measures
Visual analogue scale pain intensity · Pain pressure thresholds (algometry) · Number of trigger points by palpation · Functionality measures · Range of motion

Strengths

  • Comprehensive search across four major databases with librarian involvement
  • Clear inclusion/exclusion criteria with predefined outcomes
  • Independent dual screening and data extraction
  • Use of established risk of bias tool (Downs and Black checklist)

Limitations

  • Only one eligible study found, severely limiting conclusions
  • Included study population limited to breast cancer survivors
  • English-language restriction may have excluded relevant studies
  • Palpation for trigger points has poor inter-rater reliability, introducing potential measurement bias

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Only one good-quality study has tested aerobic exercise specifically for myofascial pain, so the evidence is very limited
  2. 02Water-based exercise like swimming or pool therapy may help reduce muscle pain and tender knots
  3. 03Aerobic exercise may work best when combined with strengthening and stretching exercises
  4. 04Talk to your healthcare provider about whether a water exercise program is safe and appropriate for you
  5. 05More research is needed in broader groups of people with myofascial pain to confirm these findings

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Summarizing the effects of different exercise types in chronic neck pain – a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews

Eva Rasmussen-Barr et al.·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders·2023

An umbrella review of 25 systematic reviews found low-to-high certainty evidence that several exercise types ease chronic neck pain short-term versus non-exercise controls, with no clear winner among them.

Exercise & MovementRead →
●●●●● LandmarkNarrative Review

The effect and mechanism of motor control exercise on low back pain: a narrative review

Hao-Ran Xu et al.·EFORT Open Reviews·2023

A narrative review concluding that motor control exercise may reduce pain and disability in low back pain, with proposed mechanisms spanning brain remapping, exercise-induced hypoalgesia, anti-inflammatory effects, and restored neuromuscular control.

Exercise & MovementRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

On the superiority of a combination of aerobic and resistance exercise for fibromyalgia syndrome: A network meta-analysis

Jiping Chen et al.·Frontiers in Psychology·2022

A network meta-analysis of 45 RCTs found that combined aerobic-plus-resistance exercise ranked first for improving quality of life, pain, and physical function in fibromyalgia syndrome.

Exercise & MovementRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercise in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

M. Dolores Sosa-Reina et al.·BioMed Research International·2017

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs (715 mostly female patients) found that therapeutic exercise may reduce pain, FMS severity, and depressive symptoms and improve quality of life in fibromyalgia, though small, heterogeneous studies limit firm conclusions about the best exercise type.

Exercise & MovementRead →