Cross-Sectional StudyPain Science & Central SensitizationClinical RelevanceDOI
6 min read
Jump to:
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Myofascial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a common condition affecting the jaw muscles and temporomandibular joint, with women being disproportionately affected. While local pain in the jaw region is well recognized, many patients with myofascial TMD report pain in multiple body areas beyond the trigeminal region. This has led researchers to suspect that central sensitization—an amplification of pain signals within the central nervous system—may play an important role in the condition. However, previous studies examining pressure-pain sensitivity in TMD patients have produced conflicting results, possibly due to small sample sizes, inclusion of patients with comorbid conditions like depression or fibromyalgia, or differences in patient selection.

Understanding whether widespread mechanical pain sensitivity exists in pure myofascial TMD, without confounding conditions, is crucial for developing appropriate management strategies that address the full scope of the disorder rather than just local symptoms.

What They Did

The researchers recruited 20 women with myofascial TMD and 20 healthy matched control women. All TMD patients were diagnosed using standardized Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) and had experienced spontaneous masseter muscle pain for at least 6 months with an intensity of at least 3 out of 10 on a numerical pain rating scale. Importantly, the researchers carefully excluded patients with any comorbid conditions that could confound pain sensitivity measurements, including other TMD diagnoses, fibromyalgia, systemic diseases, previous whiplash injury, pregnancy, depression scores above 9 on the Beck Depression Inventory, or any primary headache diagnosis.

Using an electronic pressure algometer, the researchers measured pressure-pain thresholds (PPT)—the minimum pressure at which a sensation of pressure first becomes painful—at multiple sites bilaterally across the body. These sites included three trigeminal nerve branches (supra-orbital V1, infra-orbital V2, and mental V3 nerves), three peripheral nerve trunks in the arm (median C5, radial C6, and ulnar C7), the C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint in the neck, the lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint itself, and the tibialis anterior muscle in the lower leg. All measurements were performed by an investigator blinded to whether participants had TMD or were healthy controls. The study also examined correlations between PPT levels and clinical features including pain duration and intensity.

What They Found

The results revealed dramatically lower pressure-pain thresholds in women with myofascial TMD compared to healthy controls at every single test location, and these differences were bilateral (present on both sides of the body). Specifically, PPTs were significantly decreased over the supra-orbital, infra-orbital, and mental nerves, the median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks, the lateral pole of the TMJ, the C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, and the tibialis anterior muscle (all sites: P < .001). The mean PPT values illustrate the magnitude of these differences: for example, at the tibialis anterior muscle, TMD patients had thresholds of approximately 374 kPa on the most painful side and 366 kPa on the contra-lateral side, compared to 758 kPa and 752 kPa in controls. At the TMJ lateral pole, TMD patients had thresholds around 120 kPa versus approximately 282 kPa in controls.

Crucially, there were no significant differences in the magnitude of PPT decreases between trigeminal and extratrigeminal test sites—the degree of sensitization was similar whether measured in the face, neck, arm, or leg. The PPT indices (relative decreases compared to controls) ranged from 47% to 52% across all sites. Additionally, PPT levels over the mental nerve, TMJ, C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, and tibialis anterior muscle were negatively correlated with both duration of pain symptoms and TMD pain intensity (P < .05), meaning that longer symptom duration and higher pain intensity were associated with greater mechanical pain sensitivity.

What This Means

These findings provide strong evidence that women with myofascial TMD exhibit widespread central sensitization, not merely localized peripheral sensitization in the jaw muscles. The bilateral and similar magnitude of pressure-pain hypersensitivity across both trigeminal and distant body regions suggests that the central nervous system is amplifying pain signals globally, rather than just at the site of initial injury or dysfunction. This has important clinical implications: treatments for myofascial TMD may need to address central pain processing mechanisms, not just local peripheral issues in the jaw. The correlation between longer symptom duration and greater widespread sensitivity also suggests that central sensitization may become more established over time, potentially making the condition more difficult to treat if not addressed early.

For patients, this means that pain felt in areas seemingly unrelated to the jaw—such as the neck, arms, or legs—may be genuinely connected to their TMD through shared central nervous system mechanisms, and should not be dismissed as unrelated or psychosomatic. Clinicians should consider evaluating and potentially treating widespread pain sensitivity, not just local jaw symptoms, when managing myofascial TMD.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
P < .001
Significant difference at all 9 test sites
47-52%
Range of PPT reduction across all sites
20
Women per group
Enrolled

40

Randomized
n=20

Myofascial TMD

Pressure-pain threshold assessment at multiple bilateral sites

n=20

Healthy Controls

Pressure-pain threshold assessment at multiple bilateral sites

Results Comparison

Pressure-Pain Threshold (kPa) - Tibialis Anterior Muscle

kPa
TMD (most painful side)374 kPa
Control (dominant side)758 kPa

Pressure-Pain Threshold (kPa) - TMJ Lateral Pole

kPa
TMD (most painful side)120 kPa
Control (dominant side)282 kPa

Key Findings

Bilateral widespread pressure-pain hypersensitivity in myofascial TMDHigh

PPTs were significantly decreased bilaterally over all 9 test sites including trigeminal nerves, peripheral nerve trunks, joint, and muscle tissues (all sites: P < .001)

Similar magnitude of sensitization across trigeminal and extratrigeminal sitesHigh

PPT indices were similar between trigeminal and extratrigeminal sites (47-52% reduction), with no significant differences between sites (F=2.3; P=.249)

Correlation with pain duration and intensityMedium

PPT over mental nerve, TMJ, C5-C6 joint, and tibialis anterior were negatively correlated with both duration of symptoms and pain intensity (P < .05)

No side-to-side differences in sensitizationMedium

ANOVA revealed significant differences between groups but not between sides for all test sites, indicating bilateral rather than unilateral sensitization

Study Methodology
Study Design
Case-control cross-sectional study with blinded assessor
Sample Size
40
Duration
Single-session assessment with 72-hour analgesic washout
Population
Women aged 20-29 with pure myofascial TMD vs healthy matched controls
Outcome Measures
Pressure-pain threshold (electronic algometer) · Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) · Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) · RDC/TMD diagnostic criteria

Strengths

  • Careful exclusion of comorbid conditions that could confound pain sensitivity
  • Blinded assessor design reduces measurement bias
  • Multiple anatomically distant test sites allow assessment of widespread vs local sensitization
  • Use of validated diagnostic criteria (RDC/TMD) and standardized PPT protocol

Limitations

  • Small sample size (20 per group) limits generalizability
  • Only women included, preventing conclusions about men
  • Single-center study from Spain
  • Cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or temporal relationships

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Your jaw pain may be connected to pain you feel in other body areas through your nervous system becoming extra sensitive, not because something is wrong in those other areas
  2. 02The longer jaw pain goes on, the more your whole body may become sensitive to pain—early treatment may help prevent this
  3. 03Treatments that only target your jaw muscles or joint may not be enough if your nervous system is amplifying pain signals throughout your body
  4. 04Don't dismiss pain in your neck, arms, or legs as unrelated to your jaw problem—it may all be part of the same central sensitization process
  5. 05Women with myofascial TMD should discuss with their healthcare provider whether treatments targeting central pain mechanisms might help them

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from The Journal of Pain

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianjun Liu et al.·Frontiers in Psychology·2026

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs found that CBT-based interventions produce small-to-moderate reductions in pain intensity and the largest, most consistent reductions in pain catastrophizing for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Reducing Pain, Disability, Kinesiophobia, and Catastrophizing in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luisa Medina-Viedma et al.·Medical Sciences (Basel)·2025

A meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (810 patients) found that pain neuroscience education, usually added to exercise or physiotherapy, may reduce pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing in chronic low back pain, though the authors urge caution given small trials and heterogeneity.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Pain science education and exercise interventions for people with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review, content and meta-analysis

Anna Louise Hurley-Wallace et al.·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders·2025

A systematic review and component network meta-analysis finding that pain science education had little-to-no effect on pain or function in knee/hip osteoarthritis but improved catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and self-efficacy, especially when paired with exercise.

Central SensitizationRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Central Sensitization: A Systematic Review

Beatrice Lepri et al.·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health·2023

A systematic review of 15 RCTs found that pain neuroscience education may improve pain, disability, and psychosocial factors in chronic musculoskeletal pain with central sensitization, particularly when combined with exercise or manual therapy and delivered one-to-one.

Central SensitizationRead →