Narrative ReviewEtiology & MechanismsSystematic Reviews & Meta-analysesClinical RelevanceDOI
4 min read
Jump to:

Patient-friendly summary

If you read nothing else

This review paper explores how needling therapy, like acupuncture and dry needling, can help with myofascial pain and musculoskeletal disorders by targeting specific mechanisms in the body.

Bottom line

Promising based on this evidence for needling therapy's role in treating myofascial pain and musculoskeletal disorders.

Moderate evidence

Published

2025
1 years ago
Current

Evidence hierarchy

Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
RCT
Cohort
Case-Control
Case Report ◀ this study
Expert Opinion

Study participants

1.71 billion people worldwidenot specifiednot specified

people affected by myofascial pain and musculoskeletal disorders

Words decoded

Myofascial pain
— Pain that comes from muscles and the connective tissue surrounding them.
Trigger points
— Sensitive spots in the muscles that can cause pain in other areas of the body.
Acupoint
— Specific points on the body where acupuncture needles are inserted to treat various conditions.
Descending inhibition
— A way the brain reduces pain signals by sending messages down the spinal cord to block or lessen the pain.
Full research — for clinicians and curious readers

Study Summary

Background

Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders affect nearly 1.71 billion people worldwide and are the leading contributor to disability according to the World Health Organization. About 85% of low back pain and 30-85% of other MSK disorders are caused by myofascial pain. While traditional treatments like exercise, psychosocial interventions, and medications show effectiveness, the high prevalence of MSK disorders suggests additional treatment approaches are needed. Needling therapy (NT), including both acupuncture and dry needling, has gained popularity due to growing evidence of its effectiveness.

However, the mechanisms behind these treatments remain unclear and scattered across the literature, making it difficult for practitioners to understand how and why these treatments work.

What They Did

The researchers conducted a narrative review to synthesize and categorize the effects and mechanisms of needling therapy for myofascial pain and MSK disorders. They searched four major medical databases (AMED, CLINAL, Cochrane Library, and Medline) from 2005 to 2025, looking for studies that reported effects or mechanisms of acupuncture or dry needling for treating myofascial pain or MSK disorders. They excluded studies involving wet needling (injection of substances) and focused only on dry needle insertion techniques. The review aimed to organize NT effects according to different anatomical levels of the human body and link each effect to its specific underlying mechanism using modern scientific terminology rather than traditional Chinese medicine concepts.

What They Found

The review identified 27 studies and categorized four main effects of needling therapy based on anatomical levels: (1) Myofascial effect occurs at the muscle tissue level, where needling suppresses motor end plate activity by reducing acetylcholine release, breaking the cycle that creates trigger points; (2) Supraspinal effect happens in the brain, where needling activates the descending inhibitory system, releasing natural opioids that travel down the spinal cord to reduce pain perception; (3) Spinal effect occurs at the spinal cord level, where needling triggers presynaptic inhibition through the gate control mechanism, essentially "closing the pain gate" to block pain signals; (4) Local effect happens at the needle insertion site, where controlled micro-trauma triggers axon reflex, causing vasodilation and increased blood flow that promotes tissue healing.

What This Means

This review provides practitioners with a scientific framework for understanding how needling therapies work, moving beyond traditional explanations involving "Chi" and "meridians" that are difficult to validate with modern science. By organizing the mechanisms into four clear categories based on anatomy, clinicians can better explain to patients why needling therapy might help their condition and make more informed treatment decisions. The review suggests that needling therapy works through multiple simultaneous mechanisms - reducing muscle tension at trigger points, activating the brain's natural pain control systems, blocking pain signals at the spinal cord, and promoting local tissue healing. This comprehensive understanding could help improve treatment outcomes and patient acceptance of needling therapies for myofascial pain and musculoskeletal disorders.

45/100
Evidence StrengthModerate
Study Quality
Sample Size
Replication
27
Studies Reviewed
4
Main Effect Categories
1.71 billion
People with MSK Disorders Globally

Key Findings

Four distinct anatomical levels explain needling therapy mechanismsHigh

Myofascial (motor end plate suppression), supraspinal (descending inhibition), spinal (gate control), and local effects (axon reflex)

Needling therapy works through multiple simultaneous pathwaysHigh

Unlike single-mechanism treatments, needling activates pain relief at muscle, spinal cord, brain, and local tissue levels

Scientific mechanisms can replace traditional explanationsMedium

Modern neuroscience provides evidence-based explanations without relying on concepts like 'Chi' or 'meridians'

Motor end plate dysfunction is central to trigger point formationHigh

Excess acetylcholine release leads to sustained muscle contraction and trigger point development

Rapid needling with twitch responses more effectiveMedium

Multiple lateral twitch responses during dry needling deplete more acetylcholine at motor end plates

Local tissue healing enhanced through controlled micro-traumaMedium

Needle insertion triggers axon reflex, releasing vasoactive neuropeptides that increase blood flow

Study Methodology
Study Design
Narrative review of needling therapy mechanisms
Sample Size
27
Duration
Literature search 2005-2025
Population
Studies on acupuncture and dry needling for myofascial pain and MSK disorders
Outcome Measures
Effects categorization · Mechanism identification · Quality appraisal

Strengths

  • Comprehensive synthesis of needling therapy mechanisms
  • Clear categorization by anatomical levels
  • Bridges traditional and modern scientific understanding
  • Practical clinical reasoning framework

Limitations

  • Single reviewer study selection prone to bias
  • Limited high-quality evidence (only 1 RCT included)
  • May not align with traditional Chinese medicine principles
  • No systematic review or meta-analysis methodology

Key Takeaways for Patients

What This Means for You

  1. 01Needling therapy works through multiple scientific mechanisms, not just traditional concepts like 'energy flow'
  2. 02The treatment affects your body at four different levels: muscles, spinal cord, brain, and local tissue
  3. 03Multiple twitch responses during dry needling may be more effective for trigger point treatment
  4. 04Increased blood flow after needling helps promote natural tissue healing
  5. 05The treatment activates your body's own pain relief systems in the brain and spinal cord

Read the Full Paper

Access the complete peer-reviewed study from Innovations in Acupuncture and Medicine

View Full Study

Related Research

●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) and Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation (IMES) in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

Trybulski et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2026

This systematic review found that PNE and IMES may improve pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome and tendinopathies, but evidence quality was limited by high risk of bias. Both techniques appear safe with only minor, self-limiting adverse events.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map

Kużdżał et al.·Sports Medicine·2025

This systematic review of 24 studies found dry needling effectively reduces pain in injured athletes but shows mixed results for performance enhancement in healthy athletes. Significant research gaps exist for elite athletes and long-term effects.

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkMeta-analysis

Comparative effectiveness of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for myofascial pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Liu et al.·International Journal of Surgery·2024

Network meta-analysis of 40 RCTs found manual therapy, laser therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy most effective for reducing pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome. These three treatments showed benefits across pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and functional outcomes comp

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →
●●●●● LandmarkSystematic Review

Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain—An Umbrella Review

Chys et al.·Journal of Clinical Medicine·2023

This umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews found strong evidence that dry needling provides superior short-term pain reduction compared to sham treatments across all body regions. DN is equally effective to other treatments and may provide additional benefit when combined with conventional physio

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analysesRead →